Hey /k/, so im doing a research paper on if nuclear weapons should be banned. Right now im leaning towards no with M.A.D. preventing a lot of nuke owning countries from engaging in a full blown war (proxy wars aside), but I was curious to see what you fellas thought.
>>31747114
>if nuclear weapons should be banned.
Whos gonna enforce it?
>>31747114
>Nuclear weapons are banned
>US, UK, and France completely disarm
>Nobody else does
>Now even India could defeat the US in a war using nukes
>Rest of the world laughs at America forever
>>31747167
As Anon said, nuclear disarmament never works. People just do the bare minimum they can get away with, if they listen to the regulations at all.
>>31747167
That's funny, cause the u.s. has a couple thousand nukes.
Go do research before opening your mouth.
Retarded faggot.
>>31747114
The government never breaks laws of course
>>31747282
Wtf are you talking about? He never said the U.S. doesnt have nukes, it was hypotheical, you stupid fucking retard.
>>31747213
>>31747167
Nukes have a shelf life and need reprocessing. You can see that shit from space, its why the Iran deal was so smooth, we've been watching and knowing the whole time they were peaceful.
Sure it will be dicey for 5 years, but after that, nobody is gonna have nukes.
>>31747146
The people with the nuclear weapons of c-
Oh
>>31747114
SHALL
>>31747114
NOT
>>31747114
INFRINGED
Even if you somehow managed to get everyone to disarm their nukes, there are other super weapons out there.