What weapons would he build for us if we revived him, and educated

>>31734362
What advances?
Nigga we are still using Hertzian wave theory, he disproved that shit while he was alive

>>31734362
>What weapons would he build for us if we revived him
Not you tard, he never wanted to build weapons. Hell, it was a huge thing for him that technology could and should be used to end war

>>31736449
Weapons do not mean war.

>>31736449
>Not you tard, he never wanted to build weapons. Hell, it was a huge thing for him that technology could and should be used to end war

It was an earthquake generator of PEACE.

>>31736449
>His solar death ray wasn't a weapon

>>31734362

He wanted to use technology to end warfare between peoples, so we'd probably get skynet.

>>31736449
>The inventor of an earthquake machine, death beam meant to clear the skies of airplanes out to hundreds of nautical miles, lightning guns, and sonar sets intended for use locating and engaging enemy submarines in the event of war had no interest in weapons development

Interesting theory, anon.

>>31734400

This. We haven't really advanced much theory-wise. We just learned how to reduce logic gate components in size.

>>31736907
>It was an earthquake generator of PEACE.
Never verified

>>31736945
>>His solar death ray wasn't a weapon
Never verified

>>31737393
>>The inventor of an earthquake machine, death beam meant to clear the skies of airplanes out to hundreds of nautical miles, lightning guns, and sonar sets intended for use locating and engaging enemy submarines in the event of war had no interest in weapons development
With the exception of sonar, never verified.

Seriously? You guys bought into the death ray claims and earthquake machine claims? I mean, okay sure, the earthquake machine is at more common to believe and at least technically possible (despite being absolutely silly and never proven), but the death ray? Come on. Next you're going to say "then why'd the feds take his stuff?!"

And I absolutely want to point out the entire point of the death ray was that it would make any war futile and useless to fight since it'd destroy everything. The idea was essentially that no one could ever win a war, since everyone would have the weapon for defense.

So you're right, he did try to design a singular weapon, but it's intention was explicitly to end war. As soon as he realizes you want the weapons to actually be fought with, and not solely for deterrent purposes, he's never going to do shit for you.

>>31734362
>invent ways to transfer electricity wireless
>no blueprints
>die

>>31734400
He didn't disprove it, he expanded upon the framework it was built on to include non-hertzian waves