what is the selection on the right? i got a reciever yesterday

That's the setting you point the giggleswitch towards that makes it fully semi-automatic.

>>31723259
>Actually buying a full auto receiver

Jesus you're a dumbass. That means you're going to be able to build a machine gun. The ATF partners with gun stores and sells full auto parts (WHICH ARE VERY ILLEGAL TO BUY) to criminals so that the FBI and ATF can hunt you down and arrest you. You're fucked, OP, they have your address and name and everything. Why would you buy that? Better kiss your ass goodbye, thats 10+ years in federal "pound-me-in-the-ass" prison time, buddy. plus you're a felon now so no gun rights even when you're released. (if they dont tack in enough shit to make it life, lol)

>>31723259

That's the double-feed setting. Chambers two bullets at once, so you can shoot more bullet faster.

>>31723259
Do you have any dogs?

File: 1443127270983.jpg (35KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 351x351px

>>31723259
>OP knows what a receiver is, but doesn't recognize the full-auto symbol
quality thread

>>31723311

I thought the only illegal parts were the auto sear/lightning link - the part actually classified as a machine gun.

If you put semi-auto parts in a full-auto-capable receiver, it's still a semi-auto and it's legal... right?

>>31723311
You're retarded

>>31723343
Think about that for a minute.

The lower is the serialized part. You have to transfer it, unlike every other part in the rifle. When people register SBRs, they don't register the short part they register the lower, because that is the gun.

So no the lightning link / DIAS / auto sear aren't 'firearms' they are just parts. You dun goofed I'd delete this thread if I were you.

>>31723343
The receiver is the firearm. You don't fill out a 4473 for a LPK you fill it out for the metal husk the LPK goes into. OP bought a full auto gun and is fucked.

>>31723259
He's good as long as it doesn't have the hole for the autosear pin

>>31723431
If OP owns a drill then the ATF is still going to nab him with constructive intent.

OP, you're fucked 10 ways to sunday alright. Have you kissed your dog(s) goodbye? They probably won't make it through the week.

>>31723377
>>31723383

I'm not OP, just someone who doesn't understand the convolutions of ATF regulations

So if the receiver is the firearm, then why are the lightning link / DIAS / auto sear the parts classified as a machine gun? Or is a receiver capable of taking a lightning link / DIAS / auto sear ALSO classified as a machine gun? If the receiver is a machine gun too, then how could he buy a new one? New manufacture of full-auto weapons for civilian ownership is illegal due to the 1986 law, and even if it wasn't he would have had to get a stamp under the 1934 law... right?

File: 1476835988679-783380682.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>31723431
>hole for auto sear pin
Trollolol
Guess i better get ready to get v&

>>31723352
You are, trust me (us)

>>31723529
you need evidence like a verbal or written statement of him drilling it. otherwise people speeding could get charged with intent to robbery if they own a gun and are also driving.

Freedom dispenser on some it may be called a nut buster (because you bust a nut)

File: hqdefault (1).jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

>>31723343
>>31723259
>>31723311
>>31723339
>>31723321
Op is fucked.
Dude where did he even get a FA reciver? Why would you buy that anyways OP? Do u want a Waco? Because that's how we get Waco's.

>>31723311
Dude, full auto m16 lowers have a 3rd pin hole.
That doesn't have that hole.
So the auto feature is just for show.

File: ATF.jpg (221KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1920x1080px

Better hide your dog, OP.

Its just to look cool OP, a giggleswitch without with giggle, spikes tactical lowers are a good example

>>31724618

It's not a full auto receiver, but it has a marking on the selector for full auto.

Nothing wrong with that.

>>31724618
No auto-sear pin hole = No waco
Next time, try to be less retarded.

>>31725649
Does it have a low shelf to accept full auto?

>>31723943

It's different for different firearm designs, obviously.

>>31723857
The receiver is not a machine gun, but the fact that it is capable of being used to make a machine gun gives OP the intent to build one, which is illegal.

>>31726567
A full auto AR lower receiver (third hole present) is in itself considered a machine gun, possession of which mandates automatic dog removal.

>>31726567
You're retarded. The lower is the "gun" according to the BATFE. A lightning link or similar would be "intent." What you're talking about is straight up possession.

>>31723943
wow six round burst

>>31726567

>this level of retardation

If I paint "FULL-AUTO" over the semi-auto setting, it it any closer to being a machine gun?

File: 1450849353484.png (1MB, 876x716px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 876x716px

>>31723343
>>31723352
>>31723431
>>31723943
>>31725587
>>31726231
>>31727843
>>31727894
>falling for the bait

Ya did good jimmy but time for bed, your step-dad needs the computer to upload pics of ur mum to /k/.