When you step back and look at them from the historical perspective, Wars are pretty good for nations, aren't they?
Logically, we should all be War-Lovers, shouldn't we?
>>31652312
>>31652312
If the wars happened ages ago, sure (look at the middle east).
Not to mention Russia's been through plenty of wars not recently but they're not doing that hot. Same with most of Eastern Europe.
>>31652312
The real secret is loosing wars, esp. to Western countries. Just look at Germany and Japan. Only downside is that your country will become a left-wing cuckistan or kawaii state.
>>31652312
No. WWI and WWII essentially bankrupted the British Empire even though they won.
>>31652312
Only over the very long term, and only if you dont lose and get fucking exterminated or cucked out of existence.
>>31652312
wars are good for the economy if they not fought on your land aka Proxy wars are actually good
It's good if you win, as evidenced by the Soviet, they just steal and rob everyone in eastern Europe.
>>31657155
American Revolution bankrupted the French but it helped build a better bond between the countries
>>31654139
>Not to mention Russia's been through plenty of wars not recently but they're not doing that hot.
They're only as hot as they are now thanks to the wars they're in
>>31657812
well that's a lot of ERA
every problem can be solved by slapping some more ERA on it
>>31652312
War lovers as in prepared for any war, sure.
War haters tend to not understand that war can happen anyways, no matter how much you hate it, and thereby are unprepared and lose.
>>31652312
"Si vis pacem, para bellum"
>>31657823
>a lot of ERA
It's a pretty standard amount of ERA for a T72
>>31659351
Is there any concern that if their supplies are strapped to the outside, that all that ERA is going to just fuck them over?
Also, what is procedure for loosing supplies on tank?
>>31659432
What?