>paid 3000 dollars for a stock rifle just to have it

>>31631264 Not about the looks or where its made. All that matters if it functions or not when needed. You can't put a price on reliability op.

File: 1415332767931.jpg (98KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 900x600px

>>31631264
>believing everything you read

C'mon man. Half the time people are talking shit about a gun, they've never owned it or have a competitor and feel the desire to justify their purchase.

>>31632076
>This was forged by dwarves of the Slav clan

>>31631264
is poor performance in extreme cold only caused by tolerance issues? It seems hard to believe that thermal expansion could cause so many issued. Then again, I suppose it's likely that firearms designers only worry about positive expansion due to heat from firing. So long as you can keep your gun moderately warm, it should fire, no matter what gun it is right? Could you keep it in a gun sock and tape a few heat packs to it?

>>31632189
Just put it in your trousers, Donald.

>>31632189
>is poor performance in extreme cold only caused by tolerance issues?
No. Ice can form inside the mechanisms and freeze them shut.

>>31632793
Only if there is condensation built up.

File: ECPU13.jpg (285KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1000x664px

>>31631264
>SCAR's don't work in the snow

Quick, someone tell the military!

>>31632811

Well, combusting gun powder does create a lot of hot water, by definition.

>>31632861
That SCAR definitely won't work like that.

Also his helmet is Bane.

>>31632861
Lots of guns freeze up in the snow, even bolt actions are known to fail in extreme cold environments like Canada and Alaska. But a gun that cost 3k shouldn't fail against a 60 year old design. Especially when Russian is a threat again

So what is the rifle OP?

>>31632941

>Also his helmet is Bane.

underrated post.

File: 800px-United_States_Navy_SEALs_100.jpg (105KB, 800x532px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 800x532px

>>31632941
>That SCAR definitely won't work like that.

Nigger wut?

>>31632949

You're taking some random facebook post with absolutely zero supporting evidence or circumstantial details as absolute gospel proving the gun won't work in the snow.

MAC did a video on this subject years ago and SCAR had no problems.

>youtu.be/-rNbPrDp9jk

>>31632811

You ever go camping?

Hell, I have a lunchbox gun I keep in the fridge at work and that gets condensation on it. Just from being in the fridge. Not even getting it wet by rain or other liquids. Just being in a sealed container in the cold.

>>31633050
This. This thread is based on...nothing.

File: SWAT_magazine_cold_weather_test.jpg (780KB, 2158x986px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 2158x986px

>muh German engineering
>muh Right arm
BTFO

>>31633406
>Lunchbox gun
Anon, for what purpose do you need a lunchbox gun?

>>31633631
Meat can be tough sometimes

>>31633593

It's /k/, literally all whining is attributed to either

A) I can't afford it, therefor it sucks

B) I can't own it because I don't live in a free country, but my video game knowledge tells me it sucks

You're reading about firearms on an anime board.

>>31633406
nice way to get whoever steals lunches fired

>>31633631

Work inna "gun free zone" where you can't carry. Not because it's against the rules but because it's a pretty bad idea to be carrying with the clientele I work with.

>>31633821

The whole thing actually started with someone stealing my lunch. So I put a padlock on it. Then I realized hey that's a lockbox that totally should have a gun in it and the rest took care of itself. Thus lunchbox gun came to be.

>>31633729
Ain't just whistlin' Dixie...

>>31631264
How did it fail?
I'd really like to know.

>>31636656
It didn't. Also just stop: >>31636649