[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Can we admit now that retiring the F-14 was a bad idea? >Standoff

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 29
Thread images: 10

File: 1464382668395.jpg (1MB, 3008x1960px) Image search: [Google]
1464382668395.jpg
1MB, 3008x1960px
Can we admit now that retiring the F-14 was a bad idea?

>Standoff capability and other advantages with AN/AWG-9-Phoenix combo still carries an advantage today
>Superior performance to F-18
>Upgrade to AN/APG-71 Radar would have improved use over land
>F-14D Quickstrike would of shat on the Super Hornet
>We are paying the price of it's retirement today with the South China Sea because now F-18s are being pitted against Su-30MMKs which are only a radar/missile upgrade away to rendering it inferior
>Possibility of a Silent Eagle style upgrade later
>Datalink could see it being used as missile truck
>counter to A2/AD
>>
>>31593160
>retiring the F-14 was a bad idea?
no
>>
File: into_the_trash_it_goes.jpg (31KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]
into_the_trash_it_goes.jpg
31KB, 300x400px
>>31593229
>mfw a trip makes post with no evidence or logic to back it up
>>
File: 123321.jpg (450KB, 1838x950px) Image search: [Google]
123321.jpg
450KB, 1838x950px
>>31593287
it was old and not worth upgrading.
my proof is, the folks who make those decision know more than you or I
>>
>>31593160
>He thinks a fuck huge RCS and a missile with a poor NEZ is relevant today.
>>
File: just fuck my shit up.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
just fuck my shit up.jpg
2MB, 2048x1536px
>>31593160
>maintenance costs
>maintenance costs
>oh god the maintenance costs
>>
>>31593432
This.

Also, the airframes was starting to run out of FHs.
>>
>>31593160
No, hangar queen with outdated and ineffective weapons like
>Phoenix
LOL, 3 fires, 2 engine failures and a miss in combat

It was real pretty though.
>>
>>31593160
The Advanced Super Tomcat projects would have been so much better than the super hornet, should have made those and made the Super Hornet to replace the Hornet
>>
>>31593160
>F-14D Quickstrike would of shat on the Super Hornet

>the entire reason the Quickstrike wasn't chosen was because it didn't meet the requirements of the program atf program

lel
>>
>>31593160
No. The increased commonality and reduced maintenance needs of the Bug/Super Bug outweigh any losses in capability.
>>
>>31593432
FYI - that is a picture of a Panavia Tornado, not a F-14 Tomcat.
>>
>>31593160

>Can we admit now that retiring the F-14 was a bad idea?

The F-14 was retired to save money after the end of the cold war and the Hornet was introduced as a cheaper alternative. It was purely a matter of budget. If the Navy could have maintain a cold-war-era budget, they would have probably kept the Tomcat.
>>
F14 wasn't anything special. The USA should have made a Phoenix replacement though. That was a bad ass missile.
>>
>>31593764
The AIM-120D has similar specs.
>>
>>31593764

>The USA should have made a Phoenix replacement though

For what purpose? The F-18 and F-35 are both too small to carry such a large missile. You'd have a new missile but nothing to deploy it with. The Phoenix and the Tomcat were made for each other. Literally.
>>
>>31593794
Not even close. The Phoenix has a fuck huge range and it climbs like a monster to really hit at hypersonic speed. AIM-120D is gimped.
>>
>>31593840
>The Phoenix has a fuck huge range
True
>to really hit
I've seen no evidence of that.
>>
>>31593745

wingtip missiles are AIM-9s
>>
>>31593877
yes, very good observation anon
>>
>>31593877

And?
>>
What made up most of its maintenance time, that it had two engines, or that it was a swing wing? I don't even know that much about the F14's engines, I'm guessing they changed them out for different models so lets just say the F14D
>>
>>31593834
>For what purpose? The F-18 and F-35 are both too small to carry such a large missile.

Yet can carry the >2000 lb jassm.
>>
>>31593160

When I was browsing the catalogue, I thought this thread said
>Can we admit now that retiring the F-4 was a bad idea?

Would have been a superior discussion, desu
>>
>>31593976
Go to South Korea anon
>>
>>31593943
The variable wing geometry was the main problem.
>>
File: image.jpg (295KB, 1800x1165px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
295KB, 1800x1165px
Enough about shitplanes, let's talk about shitplanes.

Where my Tiger boys at?
>>
File: 1464921118836.jpg (727KB, 2100x1500px) Image search: [Google]
1464921118836.jpg
727KB, 2100x1500px
>>31594253
>shitplanes

Didn't the F-16/18 outcompete it?
>>
File: 1464922781859.jpg (105KB, 600x761px) Image search: [Google]
1464922781859.jpg
105KB, 600x761px
>>31594253
>>31594314

I mean, good concept but when it came to the market it was kind of dissapointing
Thread posts: 29
Thread images: 10


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.