How can you tell if the technology is not real and is all just

A picture of a cap over a missile will tell you what again?

File: 0_f25a1_5dabae8f_orig.jpg (525KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 1000x667px

>>31553042
Also this looks like a stupid gun. There's a saying, if the Americans are not doing it, then it is not worth doing.

>Angry at nothing
>Too stupid to articulate a point

Another fine post on /k/

>>31553042
>all just for show
Yeah, UKSK has never been used in combat.

iArmy, please.

File: 0_f25ad_6cd67d06_orig.jpg (513KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 1000x667px

>>31553042
I thought it was bigger, now it looks less than 1 meter in diameter. top kek, what missiles can you fit in this shit?

>>31553143
Oniks and Kalibr. Probably Zirkon in tbe future.

>>31553155
Then I am disappoint in Russian missiles. That is too small.

>>31553114
Are you retarded anon ? Have you read anything about lockheed martin using soviet methods for their rockets

>>31553302
No because that didn't happen?

File: hqdefault-2.jpg (18KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x360px

>>31553042
Because we dont ever showcase OUR tech to the public for propaganda purposes....

>>31553042
you realise you can tour US ships too? I toured a french ship a few months ago, you just have to ask at the respective embassy when they are in port. You are escorted and told when you can take photos.

You stupid fucking 12 year old.

>>31553302
We buy Russian engines for commercial purposes so they don't sell them to Best Korea or Mudslims. Also they are bretty gud.

>>31553114
That's an AK630M2 CIWS, new friend.

>Americans are not doing it, then it is not worth doing.

What are you trying to say? ^_^ American friends have CIWS too!

File: russian aa explained LOL.jpg (47KB, 920x691px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 920x691px

>>31553373
Well, but nothing as cool as this.

>>31553391
Since when did you become deplorable?

What's the point of this thread?

>>31553295
And yet more advanced than anything in US arsenal.

File: 1445109127021.png (98KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 400x300px

>>31553042
>>31553114
>>31553143
>>31553295
>>31553391

>>31553933
>being this new

File: 121.png (331KB, 600x1081px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 600x1081px

>>31553816
This, i guess.

>>31554048
What ship?

I thought only Gorshkov has the Palash.
Also that CIWS shit.

>>31554132
One of the Gepards probably.

>>31553778
CTR really did a number on him.

Even I think he's too vigilant now, but I'm sure he will recover

>>31554132
OP pics are Uglich, 21631 Buyan-M. It does not have the Palash, only 11611 and 22350 have it. 21631 have Gibka and Duet.

>>31554244
I'm talking about >>31554048
Export Gepards get Palma which does not use SOSNA-R missiles for Palash which are problematic enough the Gorshkov will not use the missiles, ie CIWS will be guns only like on >>31554048 pic. But that pic does not look like Gorshkov.

>>31553042
Can we get some fucking mods in here? Jesus. Can a mod please mod me so I can start taking care of this shit? This is beyond shit posting. I should know, that's my goal on here.

Do the mods do anything at all around here? Or are they all jerking each other off in /ARG/ and the milsurp threads?

>>31553052
That OP is just as stupid as those backyard hillbillies that know nothing about military hardware.

>>31554244
>>31553042

Btw, you can find more pics from this set here:

http://fotografersha.livejournal.com/838153.html

(yes, Livejournal is the main blogging platform in Russia and has been since ~2004, stop asking).

>>31553114
CUTE!

File: Sunk by Arabs using Chinkshit.jpg (409KB, 1620x2013px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1620x2013px

>>31553042

>How can you tell if the technology is not real and is all just for show?

By using said technology to blow up american made trash, burn and sink them along with their butthurt-baltic crew (crew of the UAE operated HSV-2 were Lithuanians).

HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>31554441
Palash was tested on 1241 R-60, maybe >>31554048 pic is from there.

>>31555065
an unarmed transport ship you say?

very impressive

>>31555076
The fact that it is unarmed makes a lot of difference. Wait, fuck, it does not.

>>31555065

That was a Chinese ASM (C-802), not Russian.

>>31555086
>the fact it can't defend itself from ASMs doesn't make a difference
so how do those lead paint chips taste

>>31555065
>American garbage
Ironic shit posting is still shit posting anon.

>>31555119
Yeah, it's already better than american made garbage of the same aluminium construction standards...

I mean, at least it sailed for years without problems, while the LCS sinks itself all the time kek.

>>31555110
No it does not, only difference is the number of missiles needed to kill an unarmed or armed ships.

>>31555128
No point in arguing with retards, have fun with all those good boy points putins going to throw at you.

>>31555134
this.

Do burgers seriously think that target ships have defensive weapons?

For all purposes, that ex-USN ship was exactly that for the C-802: Target practice

File: kortik.jpg (97KB, 1046x695px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1046x695px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srZ18LUrjFE

>>31555191
So the initial missile couldn't eliminate the target and it had to resort to guns?

>>31555226
Or one missile wasn't enough. For instance, missiles like Kh-22 can tank up to three Sidewinders or one Sparrow.

>>31555065
Eik nachui, lochas

>>31555065
cute af doe

>>31555191

What always bothers me about this is that the arms are so far apart you'd think they'd both miss the target.

>>31555029
Wow, this is pretty interesting. I never seen photos taken aboard russian ships.

>>31555413
These aren't sniper rifles and bullets don't fly as straight, so two guns just create a wider range of fuckyou-zone.

>>31553391
>>31554048
give it legs

>>31555590
Kek

>>31555590
Put it on tracks and put a Drunk Russian to drive it.

File: post-15542-1176746819.jpg (12KB, 346x337px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 346x337px

>>31555590
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow-Cassiopeia
Delivered.