>>31503143
It's not coming in your lifetime.
Get a vepr, convert it.
>>31503166
I dont really like the looks of them that much.
Id rather just have a classic AK from the start and not even worry about spending more on it.
I saw an ak for 420$ that needs a 30round conversion that Im considering though.
I just want a sweet beater rifle that will last a lifetime, pack a punch, and have a world of history behind it.
>>31503406
AMD 63 or AMD 65. They're good for a beater gun at $500 bucks with alot of aftermarket
>>31503692
Nah man. AK all the way. More style
And durablity.
>>31503779
The WASR doesn't have AK durability. But I agree the WASR looks cool and simple like an AK should. Get the 10/63 if you can. It has the AK muzzle brake that performs a lot better than you'd expect.
OG WASRs are dogshit and i wouldn't even give my basement gook the damn thing.
WASR10/63s are just budget AKs. i have no issue using one though i'd rather use an Arsenal SAM.
>>31503803
Ive watched a number of training videos where they had romanian wasrs from the 80s and crammed them with rocks, yet they still fired a full magazine.
They then ran them over with russian military trucks and they still worked. They were bent to fuck though.
>>31503143
10/63, but if you save some more beans or sell some of your blood and semen you can have a better rifle.
>>31503803
>WASRs don't have ak durability
Lolwut? Source on that?
>>31506923
I agree. Everyone ive talked to says theyre built like a chevy