Since .22 is the same as .223/5.56, why hasn't anyone made a .223/5.56 handgun?
>>31502603
It isn't.
And they've had AR pistols for years.
>>31502603
Why did nato make another 7.62 round when there was already one?
>>31502631
are you referring to them making the 7.62x51 when the 7.62x54R was already around?
>.22
>.22LR
pick one
>>31502603
You're retarded, and if you're baiting then you're still retarded.
>>31502603
this is a pretty dumb bait thread...
>>31502648
>NATO developed 7.62x51mm
ok guy
>>31502603
> potato
GTFO
>>31502652
They're the same thing.
NATO stands for Not Available To Orcas.
Fuck those niggers of the sea.
>>31502603
>.22 same as 5.56
stop
>why hasn't anyone made a .223/5.56 handgun
pic related, also a contender would count
>>31502673
You know what I mean, developed to provide a standard cartridge for NATO forces, is that not what happened?
>>31502603
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kel-Tec_PLR-16
1 minute on the Google
>>31502738
I believe it was simply a cartridge developed by Winchester for their new bolt-action rifles.
Somebody correct me if I'm mistaken, here. I haven't read up on NATO cartridge adoption history.
>>31502603
Things noguns say
>>31502770
Also that garbage pocket AR from HD/Double Crap
>>31502795
.308 winchester and 7.62x51 are not the exact same.
They can be used interchangeably in most guns, but there's slight differences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9JoHzlIAqs
This video sums up the history to an alright degree.
>>31502603
Nice try Mr. ATF
>>31502699
Fuck long fan boy
>>31502895
WTF is that shit, it doesn't say anything about the differences and was generally retarded.
Here's the difference .308 is rated for higher pressures. It can be used interchangeably in .308 chambered guns and .308 probably won't explode most 7.62x51mm weapons, but don't use it.
The military developed the cartridge from the .300 savage and Winchester released it commercially before it was adopted by NATO with a very slightly different spec.