Tell me /k/ do you NEED an illuminated reticle on a low-mid power

>>31375062
NOT A BILL OF NEEDS

Sometimes it gets dark

>>31375072
>having this level of reading comprehension
>ever

File: dukenukemjt1.jpg (149KB, 864x825px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 864x825px

>>31375093
Blow it out your ass, commie.

>>31375062

-no

-not much

File: meanwhileinjapan.png (2MB, 1692x884px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1692x884px

>>31375119
this is quality trolling

>>31375126
sauce pls. I see everyone marketing illumination as a "must have"

>>31375091
can you see the nonilluminated target with nonilluminated crosshairs tho? Id think having an illuminated reticle would just leave a red dot on a black shadow in the distance.

shameless self bump

File: photo-low-light3.jpg (57KB, 570x285px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 570x285px

>>31375403
>what is dusk
>what is dawn
>what is transitional lighting
>what are streetlights not having perfect illumination

It's a lot easier to lose sights/crosshairs in darkness than it is to lose the silhouette of a man with a gun or knife trying to kill you.

File: sex.png (74KB, 400x318px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 400x318px

>>31375119

Jesus that picture is ancient. I haven't seen that in like five years.

>>31377004
wouldnt it be hard to differentiate the crosshairs from the target tho?

>>31378265
Which is why illumination is a good thing. You're agreeing with me?

>>31375062
It's handy if youre shooting a dark target. Black crosshairs on dark woods are hard for your eyes to pick up so having the choice between black and red or green is good.