I need more handguns and I'm thinking I should back order

File: 1458928916523.jpg (139KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 960x640px

>paying $1200 for Wilson meme rollmark
>not just getting the 92-G SD

...
>Probably steel/stainless, but I'm open to polymer. No aluminum.
>Wilson 92G is aluminum frame
Forget I said anything, you probably need reminders every minute to breathe and not swallow your tongue.

>>31219260
>Wilson 92G is aluminum frame

Fuck me, thread is kill. nvm

>>31219300
Most modern non-polymer pistols are aluminum framed, including Berettas and Sigs (except the stainless models).

If you want all steel, look at a CZ or a Hi-Power. Or get over yourself and buy a fucking amazing gun, because there's nothing wrong with aluminum frames.

>>31219344
> there's nothing wrong with aluminum frames.

It's just a preference. Feel free to suggest aluminum guns if you wish.

>>31219401
Ok so why is it a preference? What data brought you to the conclusion that you don't want aluminium?

>>31219216
>Wilson Combat Beretta 92G Brigadier Tactical fro $1200

as a guy who owns a classic 92FS, I think that's a fucking ripoff even for Wilson.

>>31219426

Solely about feels, I like the way steel guns shoot. That is, softer.

>>31219466

I thought it had action work at that price....but it doesn't. It's no longer a consideration.

>>31219480
A P238 shoots a billion times softer than a ppk/s. There are far more important things that go into recoil chracteristics than the frame material.

>>31219495
>It's no longer a consideration.

I'm glad you made that decision. There's not a damn thing Wilson could ever do to double the fucking price tag.

>>31219508

Noted, open to suggestions. Clean slate, jsut a $1500 budget, even open to used guns.

>>31219508
And if that steaming pile of shit sig shat out and called a handgun had a steel frame it'd be even softer.

>>31219565
M9a3, 226

>>31219565
Get a p320 and accessorize. If any serious gun control goes through then you want a gun that can do multiple things with one serial number

>>31219466
Also 92fs owner and agreed. Can buy a a1 model and swap in parts as you see fit for a hell of a lot less,

I have a wilson 92G. You faggos have n dea what your talking bout. 92G is so smooh and the trigger
Is fantastic. I hit a 7 inch steel target at 50 yards with it. All you all nigger faggots need to kill yourself.

>>31219763
>All you all nigger faggots need to kill yourself.

You can get that same bullshit without spending $1200 on a $500 pistol

File: 1469741135207.png (660KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 1024x576px

>>31219676
>M9A3

Prices are retarded now that they are dried up.

>226

Would rather have the Rex Zero 1 lel

>>31219679
>p320

The conversion kits cost $350 at least while the guns cost $425-$500. The P320 only makes sense if you want to really mod your frame. I wish the conversions were cheaper, but it makes sense that they are not.

>>31219701
> A1

I'll look into it, I might get that and a vertec.

>>31219763
>92G

The fact that it is that expensive with no action work kills it for me. Do you have other 92s to compare with?

For $1,200 you get the action upgrade as well as the Magwell upgrade it is far superior to any 92 out there you will do yourself a disservice if you don't get one I had to order mine so I was able to add options I wanted it came in about 6 weeks

>>31220323
No, the "tuned" version comes with the things you mention. At least according to this site.

http://www.shootersconnectionstore.com/Wilson-Combat-Beretta-Wilson-Combat-92G-Brigadier-Tactical-9mm-P3582.aspx

Note the two versions.