They don't call Anti Material Rifles, Their Proper name

>>31057415
Good, no one want's to carry that shit when we have anti-tank rockets galore that weigh much less.

File: inexpensive rifle for plinking.gif (2MB, 380x285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 380x285px

>>31057415
>Anti Material Rifles
It's anti-materiel, POG.

File: pl01.jpg (73KB, 820x371px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 820x371px

>>31057431
Can't even penetrate my side armor, anon.

What are you good for?

File: 1465827803750.png (155KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 500x375px

>>31057415
That's because the progression in material science has been more of a boon for armoring than anti-armoring. That, and what can be called a renaissance of land vehicle design has not caused AMR's to fail their roll, but rather to change it.

They work well in their new roll. I know in the Canadian Military the MacMillan Tac-50 does excellent work against a wide range of light to medium armored vehicles (though I imagine said armored vehicles are often buhbba's technicals.) and the targeting of specific systems on more heavily armored targets.

Apparently the TAC-50 is also used on high value targets but seeing how effecting the C14 Timberwolf is at picking people off at distance using an AMR on a single super special target has a certain fuddlore feel I can't shake off.

PS If this was bait then shit, at least a few minutes of googling let me learn something

>>31057444
Trust me, it can penetrate cardboard just fine.

>>31057415

Because AT rifles have been replaces by man portable rockets.

Unless you want to lug around a 100mm cannon or something.

>>31057415
It's a really fucking nice figure, the details are amazing.

>>31057431
This

>>31057444
That guy isn't even wearing armor, and why is he so far off to the side? shitty framing on that picture, m80, hope the photographer didn't try to charge for it.

>>31057444
isn't that all molded Styrofoam?

>>31057444
destroying radar dishes, and shooting holes in the re-fueling truck