>everyone shits on the German leadership for pushing too hard

What is this?

>>30809752
Is this a Nazi conquests choose-your-own adventures?

>>30809752
A good 50% of people are morons with a solid 25% being full retard.

>>30809752
>>everyone shits on the German leadership for pushing too hard in Barbarossa
Things that nobody thinks thread?
Germany's problem was that they couldn't push fast enough.

File: screenshot_engine_3[1].jpg (609KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1920x1080px

>>30809873
>>30809880

Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa

It's a strategy game and roleplay. You play as Franz Halder, the German Chief of Staff. You have to balance Hitler's demands, your generals bitching, and the SS influence.

Or the Soviet side.

>>30809926
Budenny's stats are too high.

File: dcbint42[1].jpg (159KB, 587x495px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 587x495px

>>30809873
>>30809880

Oh and the dev allows an option to keep track of the metrics of players, and he posts the stats for decisions on his blog. It's pretty cool.

With this and Crusader Kings, the future of strategy is definitely going to be roleplay strategy hybrid, which is awesome.

>>30809752
If anything, I'm surprised only 56% would choose the top option.

>>30809953
>$49.99 on steam
topkek atashi no tomodachi

>>30809960

Or that 0% chose to stay the course.

>>30809902
>Germany's problem was that they couldn't push fast enough.
nah nigga, they pushed fast and hard enough ":^)"
But they couldn't maintain it long enough to actually win.

>>30809902
This.

Hitler also got nervous during battle of France and scuttled their best chance at knocking Britain out of the war in 1940.

File: difficulty_big[1].jpg (2MB, 4096x3072px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4096x3072px

>These metrics show the advance of the German player (in victory points) on the vertical axis and the round number on the horizontal axis. The average player is up to a stiff challenge and even when all is going well it seldom becomes a push-over. If the German player even wins he’ll on average will need to fight in to the winter months. In the graph above the latest version is in purple.

>>30810063
>nah nigga, they pushed fast and hard enough ":^)"
No, not fast enough. They had to destroy the entire Soviet army pretty much but their infantry couldn't close the pockets quickly enough.

>>30810087
>They had to destroy the entire Soviet army pretty much
They had to demoralize the Soviet Army, which they were close to doing with Stalingrad.

I mean, why fight for glorious leader when the city bearing his name is in German hands?

If Germany could've captured the Volga, war's over.

File: 1462767540621.jpg (12KB, 320x337px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 320x337px

>>30810062

>>30810098
This is the dumbest post I've read in a long time.

>>30810145
newfag?

>>30810170
The post is dumber than even the battleship posts or glider posts.

>>30810178

There is literally nothing wrong with a battleship in 2016.

File: bigger sage.png (180KB, 2000x870px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 2000x870px

>>30809752
people are dumb, next

>>30810178
m8 ur retarded.

If the Germans captured the Volga they could have cut off literally all supplies to the Red Army in Stalingrad.
The Soviet Union at that point was running on morale alone.
People worked 18 hour shifts, just so that they could keep the troops fed and armed.
Christ they move the entire industry sector out of Ukraine and pushed it into the Urals and set up shop again in months.

Do that in modern times and it would take decades.
You're probably also the type of person who thinks the Red Army was nothing but a human wave. You probably didn't know a handful of troops held down a couple of German divisions at Brest.