>hypothetical thread time Lets just say in the future some

>>30565801

Hey you just taught yourself why gun grabbing would never accomplish shit.

>>30565801
Unless they made 80% lowers illegal there would be no way to track them, which is just one of the reasons a blanket AR ban will never work.

They would have to ban most at home gunsmithing

>>30567043
>Unless they made 80% lowers illegal there would be no way to track them

>implying they'd be able to track 79% lowers even if 80% lowers were illegal

>>30567122
True, there would just be other ways, and always will be.

I always laugh when people think banning guns is going to "Dry up the flow of assault weapons". Like they'll all just magically disappear and nobody will make more.

>>30565801
If they want to seriously go at gun banning, they would simply redefine what constitutes the "gun".

In multiple european countries, barrel and chamber are regulated parts.

Also, since in current US law barrels are not a gun, thy might try banning them and then say "hurr we are not banning guns and not violating 2a. why are you so angry about"

Dont underestimate the malicious fuckers.

>>30567078
Again - look at europe, which is their main source of inspiration. They will attempt to do so as soon as they feel they could get away with it.

>>30565801
They will ban selling the rest of the parts.

Just knock on the online store's door and ask for their databases. That's what they did in Cali with those polymer lowers

>>30565801

The California gun ban includes AR-15 80% lowers

>>30567078
>>30567043
>>30565808
>implying in a gungrab scenario they won't just make other parts like uppers, bolts and barrels regulated parts

File: 1467531024612.jpg (146KB, 1237x1126px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1237x1126px

>>30565801
Just wait till Hillary is elected, all of your questions will be answered.

>>30565801
>If some crazy ban were passed and machineguns were banned. How would anyone be able to track auto sears?

The same way they do now. Compliance by the overwhelming majority of law abiding citizens. AKA gun owners.

>>30569428
Couldn't you sell 80% lowers as paperweights or "nonfiring replica"

>>30569523
>hypothetically couldn't you do x if hypothetically y happened?

WHAT IF HYPOTHETICALLY Z HAPPENED??