What does /k think about PDW stocks? might pick one up on

>>30350621
They're scary and they should be banned. Shoulder things that get longer are just as bad as shoulder things that go up.

>>30350640
now that you say that I am getting scarred

>>30350621
I think they are retarded unless you get the Honey Badger Upper and stock combo.

The majority require a proprietary carrier, the rest require a proprietary receiver set

>>30350621
Would only use on an integrally suppressed upper for maximum stealthiness.

>>30350621
I think I'd rather get a bullpup than a stupidly short stock like that.

>>30350621
Complete waste on a 16" rifle, just get a Law Tactical folding adapter if you want to cut length for storage.

>>30350621
>have sbr
>have billet lower with thicc buffer tube area
>want PDW stock
>worried it wont clear the buffer tube area
What do?

File: 1416186792554.jpg (95KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 768x1024px

>>30350768
Find the dimensions champ, I am sure some autist took full measurements.

>>30350768
a Vert PDW stock has a hole for the tube

>>30350621
look awesome, not worth the money/hassle though

>>30350852
thats what i am thinking. It looks awesome but i would much rather have function the looks

>>30350656
Indeed, I'm pretty nervous, and skeleton stocks spook me.

MVB is what you want.

Uses standard BCG/lower
Operates with one hand
Has plenty of buffer weights available.

Kinda expensive but I love mine. Also decently heavy but it's an aluminum stock, so what do you expect?

>>30350621
I'm trying to find images of how they'd look on an AK. Guess they only look good on SBRs?

They look sweet, but they're not particularly comfortable to use.

>proprietary everything for the base
>cost a shtiload
>not exactly that comfortable
Seriously, just get a regular collapsible buttstock,

File: IMAG0593.jpg (3MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2688x1520px

>>30350621
If you want short, look up the LWRC UCIW stock. I got one for like $100 shipped.

Would only put it on an SBR though.