Clockwise from top left: Ranger Green, MAS Grey, Coyote Tan,

File: 1453223756065.jpg (45KB, 690x525px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 690x525px

>>30332265
1. MultiCam Tropic
2. MultiCam
3. MultiCam Arid
4. Nothing, black sucks

Multicam
/thread

Except for black of course

M81 Woodland
M81 Woodland
M81 Woodland
M81 Woodland.

>multicam
>multicam
>multicam
>multicam black

File: 13953661.jpg (13KB, 620x405px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 620x405px

>>30332353
M81 is objectively crap.

File: ACU Hide.jpg (533KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 1600x1064px

>>30332265
dirty ACU.

Multicam has at least 2 colors that stick out in every environment, essentially like the F35, its a jack of all trades and master of none.

File: a-humble-opinion.png (158KB, 1851x487px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1851x487px

>>30332455
Know how I know you have no idea what you're talking about?

Kryptek Mandrake
Kryptek Highlander
Kryptek Nomad
Kryptek Typhon

>>30332507
>Regardless, the pattern is area specific
Go wear your multicam in the snow faggit. Also,

>ACU =/= UCP
>posts a brand new out of bag UCP uniform, that almost looks like its the blue navy variant.
stupid cunt.

File: 1431243343.jpg (198KB, 1250x1025px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1250x1025px

>>30332578
>>30332578
Dude...are you fucking retarded? Obviously, I know that ACUs and UCP are two different things. YOU are the one that said "dirty ACU" was a good camouflage. So exactly what did you mean by this if you weren't implying UCP?

>Go wear your multicam in the snow faggit.
Shifting goalposts. Why the fuck does this mean anything if the pattern you specified works like shit in the snow? Guess what, patterns that aren't specifically manufactured for the snow work poorly in it. The same cannot be said for arid, woodland, and tropic environments. There is no argument that you can make against MultiCam in the snow that cannot be made for ALL other non-snow specific colors.

>>30332678
Just stop dude. He doesn't know the difference between ucp and acu so I'm gonna give a 100% chance that he knows nothing about camo effectiveness.

File: 2053240146[1].jpg (282KB, 804x534px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 804x534px

UCP apologists are insanely naive.

File: acu snow.jpg (1013KB, 2048x1367px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 2048x1367px

>>30332678
>I know that ACUs and UCP are two different things. YOU are the one that said "dirty ACU" was a good camouflage. So exactly what did you mean by this if you weren't implying UCP?
Maybe I meant Dirty ACU, just like I said?

Lets see some multicam in the snow environments, friendo....

>>30332812
That camo isn't called acu you fuckin dumb truck. Also it works like shit there.

>>30332860
If they werent wearing fuckin coyote tan Go-Go boots, you wouldnt even notice the first two people up the line.

Still waiting on your multicam pic Squid.

>>30332812
>Lets see some multicam in the snow environments, friendo....
What's your argument? That UCP works marginally better in snow and worse everywhere else so it's a better pattern?

File: 1426174369721.jpg (165KB, 2772x1842px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 2772x1842px

>>30332812
Those ACUs look like shit in the snow. A real snow pattern is easily 300% better.

File: 160225_ni9fz_rci-cold-response-marines_sn635.jpg (59KB, 635x357px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 635x357px

>>30332879
Not that anon, but I like posting pics. Sorry for bad res.

>>30332920
And you've just come full circle, getting slapped down at every turn. Im out.

File: Screenshot_2016-04-19-01-55-44_1.jpg (266KB, 1078x1336px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1078x1336px

>>30332940

File: Screenshot_2016-04-05-22-27-38_1.jpg (245KB, 1076x1088px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1076x1088px

>>30332957

>>30332812
1. It's not "ACU"
2. It's HORRIBLE compared to the vast majority of camo patterns (the army, which invented it, admitted this)
3. You would know this if you had even the faintest about camo
4. Fuck off you retarded faggot

>>30332373

I have this horrific nagging feeling that you're a civ.

File: image.jpg (333KB, 1920x938px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1920x938px

Multicam Alpine?

>>30332941
>you've just come full circle
What does that mean? I just wanted to figure out what you were arguing.

File: image.jpg (172KB, 650x435px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 650x435px

>>30332974

File: image.jpg (147KB, 665x445px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 665x445px

>>30332999

File: image.gif (23KB, 288x200px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 288x200px

>>30332455
>mfw someone is defending ucp again

>>30332455

Jack of all trades, master of none? What is UCP then? Master of places we never fight in, shit in actual warzones? Lotta good that does...

So how does grey do in a variety of environments? I love in a sea of sage brush so I thought grey would do alright.

>>30333140
It's alright, but neutral browns are typically better across a broader range. Here's an article about grays for urban environments:

https://www.milspecmonkey.com/index.php/articles-page/63-articles/454-a-real-urban-grey
https://www.milspecmonkey.com/index.php/articles-page/63-articles/455-a-real-urban-grey-part-2

They conclude that many of the grays aren't really that good.

>>30332879

>go go boots

you don't know what your precious camo is even called and think gators are "go go boots".

you are either one of the most dedicated trolls or the biggest fucking retard I've seen in weeks

>>30333066
It's really really really good if you're patroling an abandoned mine with no light whatsoever

Green
Grey
Tan
Black


I like solid colors.

File: Propper_ATACS_AU_8_lores__25319.1398019634.1280.1280.jpg (292KB, 882x1280px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 882x1280px

What does k think about atacs au?
I have some pants and a boonie hat in this camo and idk what to mix it with. Most of my other stuff is in coyote and my rifles have some dark earth on em.

>>30333548
I think it's a pretty good desert pattern, but it's not "multi-environment" like their website claims.

>>30333907
Hmm. Well I'm in the California central valley where everything is pretty much dead brush and golden wheat colored.
I would be heading north to oregon in it if shtf

File: 245452433454.jpg (425KB, 1300x886px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1300x886px

>>30333941
>oregon
Have you looked at their FG pattern? It's a pretty excellent woods camo.

>>30333994
SoOre here. Can confirm that A-Tacs FG and Marpat are excellent mid-summer to late fall camo options.