Future wars will be fought with swarms of nanotech robots that

>>30244344
seems plausible.
care to elaborate any further?

>>30244524
Nanomachines, son.

All you need to know.

Armstrong 4 lyfe

>>30244344
Why would anyone bother? Our current method of incinerating people and driving some sort of wedge into their body is pretty effective

File: 123623612315.jpg (63KB, 624x644px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 624x644px

>>30244532

>>30244344
"Nanotech" has replaced magic as the new way to explain the crazy shit people come up with.

Nano-machines are theoretical, when leonardo davinci was drawing wooden bird wings powered by pedals and hand cranks he was about as close to flight as we are to what you just described, if its even possible at all.

>>30244942
It's physically possible, per Drexler, Freitas, Merkle, and other physicists who ran the math.

The question is how long it takes to get the engineering done and how destabilizing it will be.

>>30244344
>Future wars will be fought with swarms of nanotech robots that get into enemy bloodstreams and get BTFO by the nanodefenders already present.

FTFY, anon.

You're welcome.

>There will be wars when the nwo rules

File: 1456177961153.png (529KB, 925x519px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 925x519px

>>30244344
>implying countermeasures won't be developed, either making the nanobots vastly less effective or rendering them useless altogether
every time a "game-changing" meme fighting technology comes along, a decent counter arrives a decade later at most, usually far sooner if the tech is considered a major threat. Nanomachines will be no different, so you can tell your boy Armstrong to take a hike.

Future wars will be fought with little pieces of metal going very fast.

There's a simple elegance to it.

>>30245584
EMPs. Mostly harmless to humans. Or magnets. An MRI should do the job.