Is there anything wrong with naked wars of aggression? I think

File: 41KLsyHkPAL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (17KB, 229x346px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 229x346px

>>30241676

you are a middle school fag

The fact that this bullshit thread bumped the patch thread off the board is why /k/ is fucking cancer

File: flat,1000x1000,075,f.u1.jpg (117KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1000x1000px

>>30241702
>patch thread
>not cancer

>>30241694
I haven't read that book. Could you explain why wars of aggression are substantially different than any other war?

I just don't see reasoning, except for virtue-signaling holier than thou faggotry. Every war has an aggressor. What is the point of Just War theory? To make the conquerors feel bad about themselves? Is it just feel good propaganda that the victorious party can use to justify cruel treatment of the defeated party in their version of history?

File: 1465654944373.jpg (32KB, 469x290px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 469x290px

>>30241702
>Patch threads

>>30241913

just read the book then, instead of continuing this edgy teenage angst faggotry

File: 1458709506743-1.jpg (206KB, 640x678px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 640x678px

You know what, I agree with you for the most part. I mean, there's one or two wars I'm not too big on. But for the most part, I see nothing wrong with war for conquest.

File: 1462832043700.jpg (46KB, 461x424px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 461x424px

>>30241942
>Trust me this obscure deontological circle wank is totally true, relevant and can explain how the world actually works in real life

OK

>>30241985
>if its in a book its stupid, I want to read a bunch of random idiot opinions on /k/ and disagree with all of them until i find someone that agrees with me so i can circlejerk

ok i summed up the rest of this thread now mods please delete it

>>30241985

it is not deontological if the book presents its own theories. and it just happens to be the latest twist of a philosophy that has been part of western culture for half a millenia, so it's hardly obscure.

also OP asked a question on moral justification, not "is this how the world works".

faggot.

>>30241985
>wont read a fucking book
>its current year, the past has nothing to offer our enlightened intellects
>muh presshuss time a bloo bloo
>on a mongolian pottery market

>>30241676
>naked wars of aggression
>profitable today

Khornefag leave.

>>30241913
>to make the conquerors feel bad about themselves?

Yes, it's propaganda made by the juize to make Germany feel bad about themselves.

Honestly, are you that much of a summer to be this retarded?

>>30242082
>>30242029
>>30242024
reminder to put "sage" in the options field to keep this thread from getting bumped

File: 20090611141411_looking-thoughtful.jpg (85KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 700x700px

>>30242009
>Boo hoo I don't like this thread! Mods delete plz
>Boo hoo this country is a big meanie! UN sanction plz

Just War theory, everyone

>>30242274
>let's go kill thousands of people because fuck em

You must be 18 years old to post here

>>30242024
>Doesn't understand a book and is unable to discuss it past posting a picture of the cover that you just googled on an loatian moonshiners culture board

Next thing you'll tell me is that just war theory endorses wars of conquest to bring democracy to other countries.

File: 1457940650103.gif (2MB, 363x330px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 363x330px

>>30242305
>Let's starve a million women and children with sanctions because muh Axis of Evil

You must be 18 to post on this board

>>30241702
>tripfag circlejerks about X product is more important than educating a child about military philosophy

you're cancer. go get job on tobacco farm.