How effective would a 7.62x39 ar pistol with a 10" barrel

File: 58367807.jpg (145KB, 500x449px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 500x449px

It would probably work about as well as subsonic .300 Blackout. Which is decently well.

On a side note, how is a subsonic .460 Rowland different from a .45 ACP?

>>30217220
Theoretically itd work. How would you plan on managing the recoil?

>>30217231
Thats the point. It cant be, so its louder. But i like the round so it naturally came to mind.

File: 1461557199181.jpg (50KB, 1137x640px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1137x640px

>>30217220
It would be an effective HD weapon.
>large enough round
>good velocity
>supressed
>small enough
How is this even a question? Duh! Of course its an effective weapon for HD.

just be aware that your rounds will still go through the walls. A firewall should stop them....it might not though. So in an apartment this might not be the best weapon.

Your .460 would be better....so long as you out a can on it.

>>30217231
no difference in practice i think, but then again .460 rowland wasn't designed to be subsonic

>>30217244
Its gonna be a hd gun. I think i can get away with things. Its not gonna be seen in public.

>>30217258
no, but if it ever has to be put to use, an illegal gun is an illegal gun to the investigating officer...

>>30217258
The law says differently, but let's say theoretically, regardless of ATF fuckery, how would you stabilize it.

>>30217258
the recoil will be a non-issue since you have a hand hold up front. If you really MUST stabalise it use an AR stock adapter and put on a sig brace.
>>30217268
alsothis. If you ever do use it....you go to jail for violating the NFA

>>30217231
Subsonic .300 uses a 200 grain projectile or something to be effective and subsonic. He's talking about a 122 grain projectile subsonic, which would have a much lighter powder charge. It'd be the same as shooting someone with a 7.62 nagant round just about, or shooting someone with an AK at like 700 yards. It's gonna hurt, but it's not going to be as effective as a high velocity round in close proximity.

>>30217231
Not quite. The .300BO was made for 10" AR's and the 7.62 wasn't. If that's the route your going to go might as well get the .300 and call it a day. Plus you'll be able to change out uppers should you feel like it.

>>30217666
The Krink seems to do just fine
They found the x39 doesn't suffer from short barrel lengths and the powder used by eastern bloc countries is more akin to black powder than smokeless in terms of how it burns

>>30217258
Pay your fugging tax stamps.

$400 is better than being convicted of federal crimes.

You ever gonna try shooting it anywhere? Make sure it fucking works? You got the land for that?

If you're shooting subsonic 300blk or 7.62x39 you may as well be shooting a pistol cartridge.

Good fucking luck finding subsonic AK food if you don't reload.

>>30217231
>It would probably work about as well as subsonic .300 Blackout. Which is decently well.

No it would work about as well as .38 special but it probably wouldn't cycle for shit without careful tuning.

>On a side note, how is a subsonic .460 Rowland different from a .45 ACP?

Longer case, after market barrel, more expensive to shoot, you would have to load your own and it completely defies the point of using the .460 in the first place.

Won't penetrate body armor.

>>30217220
It's a gun, it will work.