Whats the deal with 357 semi? How would it compare to 10mm

>>30207512
It's like if .40sw was done right

File: article-2519574-19E6389B00000578-37_306x513.jpg (29KB, 306x513px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 306x513px

>>30207512
This is going to be the best thread.

>>30207542
>This thread is archived.

File: image_4.jpg (125KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 500x500px

/thread

File: zerg.png (66KB, 233x255px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 233x255px

>>30207542
>>30207692
>>30207838

>>30207512
>knockdown power
wew lad

It's 357 mag vs 41 mag. The 10mm was designed to replicate the 41mag. And it did that. 750lb of force. 357= powerful 10mm= even more power

>>30207512
Well, it's a good round for penetration through vehicle glass and body panels. The high velocity and penetration qualities means that it's a promising round for woods carry with the right ammo. The handguns that chamber generally have thinner slides and grips than 10mm handguns.

>>30208556
.357 sig mang

>>30207512
9x25 Dill better. It'll never catch on though because wildcat.

File: Bait What Bait.jpg (47KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 625x626px

>>30207542
>>30207542
>>30207692
>>30208060

>>30208556
it's 357 sig, which is a 40 necked down to a 38

>>30211912
Them good but expensive. Good for people bad for bears. 10mil good for people good for bears, good for everything!