Has anyone ever seen the B&T APC223? Now, I fucking won

>>29847301

It couldn't possibly be the chamber specs. I mean it's not like a .223 chamber is different than a 5.56 chamber, right?

>>29847301
could be a .223 win vs a .223 wylde

>>29847340
Check the specs.

It says ON BOTH:

>Calibre 5.56 x 45 mm / .223 Rem

So, not it can't be the caliber when they have the exact same caliber for both version.

Or else you would see the APC223 as being advertised as being chambered only for .223.

File: BT-APC556-GUNDOLL.jpg (433KB, 1200x870px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1200x870px

Yeah. They've been "out" since 2015 but no dealer has them. It's a tease. Meanwhile, 9mm a shit semi auto neutered TP9s keep pouring in.

>>29847301

>different stock
>different muzzle device
>different gas block

Yeah the specs are exactly the same.

are both of them the american versions?

since in europe everything 556 is called 223 as per the spec. 556 nato follows european 223 CIP specs.

while in the us 223 and 5.56 are slightly different. 5.56 handling more pressure than 223 if im not mistaken

Isn't it pretty much just a Swiss 805/Scar?

>>29847301
Watch literally any of their Shot show coverage. 556 is their standard gun, 223 is the name for the import model. Biggest difference is a 16" barrel to avoid SBR.

>>29847301
From what I heard the APC556 would be the military/law-enforcement full-auto version, while the APC223 would be the civilian semi-auto version.

Also, what's funny, in Switzerland the APC223 is much cheaper than a SIG PE90 (civilian version of the SIG 550).

>>29847568
apc223 looks cheap as fuck though

>>29847568
The lower receiver is polymer so it should