Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Given that a squad of special forces operators is the equivalent of a infantry battalion on the field in their capability, would WWII have been made vastly easier if we had deployed nothing but special forces in lieu of regular infantry in Europe or the Pacific?
>>
they should just remove infantry and replace them with special force, but the military is a social welfare program, so obama wouldn't pass it
>>
Theres actually zero reason or purpose to have infantry at all
>>
>>29724379
sometimes you need numbers rather than skill, infantry secure land, keep supply chains running, control the local populace.
please delete this thread.
>>
>>29725049
this
use your infantry to hold a town and man check points while the operators operate operationally
>>
>>29724849
>>29724379
Whoa there Sun, your going to use up your bait too fast and we'll have to motorboat back to shore to get more bait at the pro shop.
>>
>>29724379
who gave a 12 year old an ar with a 203 on it?
>>
>>29724379
Given that op sucks raging cock more than any living being in our plane of existence, shouldn't prostitutes be outmoded?
>>
O hey guys whats goin on in this thread
>>
>>29725564
an in depth debate on manpower and troop usage during a war
welcome
>>
File: tumblr_mz81lugzO51s9d2ieo3_540.png (157KB, 540x362px) Image search:
[Google]
157KB, 540x362px
>>29724379
>Given that a squad of special forces operators is the equivalent of an infantry battalion on the field in their capability
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3