Is there a reason we haven't started using clones in the

>>29382708
It's very difficult to recreate memories. They aren't a physical aspect of your body the same way cells are.

Too compare, Wolverine can grow back from a single cell, but he won't have any memories, because those can't be grown, only created.

>>29382726
Couldn't you just copy them over from the original's brain into the clone brains?

>>29382708
>Is there a reason we haven't started using clones in the military?
Uh, maybe because we don't have the technology to make human clones? You FUCKING MORON

okayfaggot, here is the thing about Cloning:

Clones are not the same as copping a single person like a peace of paper through a fax machine. a Clone is simply a genetically identical organism to the parent organism. Dolly, the first cloned Sheep had to be grown from a single cell, and grow up at normal Sheep speed, but she was already at the genetic age 6 when she was born. She had a much shorter life than predicted.

Cloning isn't magic, it's science, and we are trying to figure it out but it's not some fucking thing we can Clone Wars it.

>>29382746
no, Memories, experiences and skills are part of the neural network of the brain. we cannot artificially make a biological neural network. we can do it with machines, but machines have a very narrow scope of learning compared to the human brain.

>>29382781
We do actually. Animal cells are animal cells, whether they're from humans, apes or sheep.

It's just, why go through all the trouble of cloning, raising and training a soldier for twenty years or whatever when you can just grab some random schmo and accomplish the same thing in one?

File: tumblr_o1f6kn2gMZ1s10e4po1_250.jpg (8KB, 186x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 186x200px

>>29382746
I don't know enough about memories to say, but I think no, with something to do with synapse use and electricity.

I think it'd all go to short term memory and a very small percentage of the shit would actually be stuck in, meaning that the training would still be required.

>>29382809
>Dolly, the first cloned Sheep had to be grown from a single cell, and grow up at normal Sheep speed, but she was already at the genetic age 6 when she was born. She had a much shorter life than predicted.

What? That's absolute bullshit. She died of cancer. The idea that she had a "genetic age" is media speculation.

>>29382781
Are you fucking retarded?

http://news.discovery.com/human/genetics/china-clone-factory-scientist-eyes-human-replication-151201.htm

>>29382708
Is this going to become the next Ant Man or something?

>>29382856
>implying older things don't have a higher rate of cancers

>>29382943
Given that it's an extremely common way for indoor sheep to die, there's absolutely no correlation.

>>29382829
for right now. Given enough time we will make artificial neural networks that are indistinguishable from a biological. Hell we could make them chemical/electrical out of the exact same materials given enough precision.