What would be your weapon of choice if you had to assassinate someone?
Pic related, the PSS silent pistol
pipe bomb
>I liked to fantisize about being a mysterious hitman with a speshul snowflake weapon
grow up
>>28520717
booby trapped pipe bomb behind door
>>28520717
It depends who, but honestly it would probably just be a beater revolver.
None of the bullet casing go flying with possibly my prints on them and I can just throw the entire thing in a lake or something.
>>28520717
bang
you're dead kid
>>28520717
also check em
>>28520774
>this
derringer wuld werk 2
A Davy Crockett.
Any handgun, walk into a crowd of supporters, and shoot him or her when they come by to shake people's hands and stuff. I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often, honestly. It seems like it'd be so easy to do.
>>28520717
MkIII with the silencer.
If you really want to get special snowflake, Nagant revolver with the suppressor.
>>28520717
Atomic bomb. Think about it.
>only witnesses have been exposed to shitloads of radiation and will be kill
>very few witnesses
>can't be caught
It's brilliant.
>>28521302
Easy to do, hard to get away with. Hard to find someone so fanatic they are willing to go to prison.
>>28520717
Low profile target, make it appear to be an accident.
High profile target, force someone who prepares them food to poison them via kidnapping their loved ones, also find a modern day Lee Harvey Oswaldt for a patsy and a Jack Ruby to eliminate a chance of a slip up in court.
>>28520717
> PSS
> not 6p9
>>28520717
I would use best machine pistol of course.
M38 Carcano.
Mk23 with Knights Supressor.
Don't care it's a vidya famous overrated. I fucken like it.
>>28520747
>i want one because its cool
good enough reason to own a gun
>i want to own THIS gun because its cool
not good enough
so, what is it. freedom or not freedom, motherfucker
Explosives attached to hamsters
>>28520717
Glock 23 with a spare slide and 9mm barrel.
>Make with the bang-bang
>Swap slides, put stock 40 back on
>Pull 9mm barrel out of used slide, NINJA VANISH barrel
>"Sure, officer, go ahead and test my gun, I'll cooperate."
The only acceptable choice.
>>28526269
no-guns vidyafag here. THATS how short the barrel is? holy shit. its stalker stats are too gud to be true
and thats ALSO a stalker render. hell yeah
>>28527536
It is still an armor piercing sub sonic integrally suppressed assault rifle.
no one in the west has an equal to this rifle.
>>28520717
a .22 revolver
>>28526245
That still doesn't explain all the gun powder residue found on your face, hands and clothes.
>>28527591
>armor piercing
as in 3a kevlar right? big deal, just use a 300bl ar15
>>28527591
I thought the armor piercing came from supersonic steel core ammunition.
>>28527597
didnt work
>>28527536
The quality of the barrel will determine accuracy, not the length.
>>28527591
That's because it can't penetrate modern armor.
And it drops like a fucking rock. So it has a max effective range of <200m without a good optic with subtensions, which the Russians don't have.
Also, just like only Russian SOF have it, American SOF have access to various subsonic, armor penetrating assault rifles as well. I know at a minimum 3rd group has mk18's in 7.62x40WT and tungsten-core AP ammo for them, the Army's bought 200,000 .300blk uppers and over 5 million rounds of subsonic AP, then you have boltguns in the large whispers like .,500 whisper.
Buuut...they all also suffer the same problem. They drop like a fucking rock.
bets assassin gun in my opinion is supresses ar-7
>>28527687
thats what she said...but really, there must be a point where length exceeds quality
A suppressed Ruger 10/22 with subsonic ammo
>>28527751
no, lenght only affects velocity which affects flatness which makes accuracy easier but not inherently better. Even lenght has a limit too, an ar15 with a barrel exceding 20" looses velocity because the powder is burnt and friction slows the bullet.
>>28527834
so why are sbrs shit on so much, if quality can overcome the disadvantages? is it just cost/difficulty? if money isnt a factor, why not go short?
>>28527591
Armor piercing or sub-sonic... choose one
>>28527871
It depends on context mostly. Wan't to fight innacity?
>m4
fighting inna desert?
>m16
I know it's oversimplified but you get the point.
>>28527904
>wan't
I wated
Also, bullpups have a long barrel and short overall length, if you can deal with the different trigger.
>>28527880
Hardness and high sectional density will provide a degree of armor-piercing capability. Velocity isn't the only criteria (though it is certainly helpful).
>>28527904
yeah, but, if i had an unlimited budget, could i match your average m16 with a super high quality m4? not that it would be cost effective, but, is it doable?
>>28521501
Under-rated post
>>28528059
you will never get the velocity back
if you are referring to accuracy theres no reason the shorter gun cant be better if it was simply manufactured to higher standards
>>28528131
well cool, thank you for the information. so, uh, whats the argument for velocity, to appease a complete no-gunz?
>>28520717
Zodiac
>>28520774
>Not just loading your mags with thick gloves on
You should really be doing this anyway
>>28527607
He was just coming home from the range.
>>28520717
nitrogen asphyxiation. pretty much undectable
Car bomb
Ghost gun.
Point blank ofcourse
probably obsolete but up close I'd like a welrod. at range probably some suppressed briefcase bolt gun
>>28520717
DeLisle Carbine in 10.35×47mmR.
Tsar Bomba
>>28521302
They tried that with reagan
If liberal, rock
If not, the some shitty slambang.