If an F-35 was sent back in time to 1941 with enough supplies

>>28405546
If OP was sent back in time to suck all the dicks for non stop sucking, is he the biggest fag?

>>28405546
It would be immediately spotted by WW2 radars and shot down by WW2 fighters since it can only carry 4 missiles.

>>28405546
No.

For once, one F-35 does not carry enough payload to take out an entire fleet. Which means that Japs could employ the single most effective AA possible - tanks rolling on your airfield.

Does it get modern ASMs?

If so, it could be a huge help in putting the IJN at the bottom of the Pacific.

>>28405565
He doesnt need to be send back in time to achieve that

>>28405580
It takes like a week for a Jap fleet to get to Hawaii from Truk. F-35 can make enough trips to sink the whole fleet in a week.

>>28405546
no. it's role would be the center of a reproduction initiative. it would likely never see combat.

>>28405546
No it couldn't because the F-35 is terrible. First of all: Stealth is obsolete because it can be detected by Russian and Chinese WW2 radars (Source: Pierre Sprey) This means that the Pentagon is wasting $1.5 trillion per plane (Which has already been spent, btw) on a plane that's a lemon. It's a turkey that can't turn, can't climb, and can't run. There's also so much wrong with the jet. The helmet doesn't work and is useless anyway, and it doesn't have a gun/it's gun doesn't work. It also can't fly through rain or run on hot fuel, it's not stealthy with external stores, and its engine catches fire. It can't even beat what it's meant to replace, because it's a jack of all trades and a master of none. The F-16 beat it in a dog fight and it can't flow low-and-slow to perform CAS like the A-10, which will always be better at CAS (Source: http://warisboring.com/articles/in-a-contest-the-u-s-air-force-knows-the-f-35-will-lose-to-the-a-10/ and also there are some RT articles if you google). I'm Russian and Chinese and our plane is better because it has artificial intelligence and can fly at the speed of light. Anyone who disagrees with this is a Jewish Lockheed shill. This comic basically sums it all up: http://imgur.com/a/0I00D#28

File: 1439692225336.jpg (97KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 800x800px

>>28405636
perfect

>>28405613
You said "a lot of supplies". Not "magically doesn't need any maintenance ever".

How many B61-12s will the F-35 carry?

>>28406333
All of them.

>>28405546
no because the F35 needs a pilot

>>28405546
It could potentially turn the tide of the war for whoever had it but it would eventually be destroyed while refueling or resupplying. Now, two squadrons, so at least one could always be in the air...they would be unstoppable.