I'm very Interested in CCW, currently looking at Kahr PM9's,

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3888x2592px

Bonus Info

I live in South Florida, and never wear jeans/work pants. I'm always in shorts or when I'm working, a suit.

I'm already experienced with funz. This is just my first CC peice.

Have you considered the Kahr MK9? I've never shot it, but if it's metal framed you want, it might be worth a look.

I and a bunch of other /k/ommandos have p938s, and if you're cool with carrying cocked and locked, it's not a bad choice. thing is tiny.

>>27946863
My mom has a P938 and I like it, but my autism requires me to carry something different. And yeah the MK9 looks cool but I'm not sure about it due to the lack of reviews.

I have a pm9.

Very light, easily concealed, very accurate for a compact pistol. I love the thing. Can hit card sized groupings at 50 yards with the little bastard (using the grip extension mag). Smooth trigger that has just a little play a clean break and a quick reset.

Carry everyday tucked iwb at appendix. Its just barely too large to fit in a pocket comfortably though.

Some folks seem to think the cw series is worth the reduced price

Mk series are nice too but they feel much heavier for an edc. Plus there's a price hike for all metal frame

>>27947161
Thanks man, I'm loving the look of that thing.

How does it stack up to the Glock43/Shield?

>>27946536
have you looked at the cz rami?

>>27946536
I think I speak for everybody when I say avoid Kimber. P938 is the way to go for a baby 1911/ultimate CC piece. If your mom already has one, all the better. You can steal/swap her grips out for yours if you want, and she'll know exactly what mags to buy for your birthday

regarding Kahr? Always been curious, but they've always seemed a little overpriced considering Sig's/HK's offerings. Not even a brand queen, but I'm just not sure I'd get what I payed for.

>>27947203
>>27947203
Well kahr came about as a direct competitor to glock so compared to the glock you are going to see many similarities. Trigger being the biggest difference physically with glock's safety. Kahrs triggers are heavier by a pound or two. The Glock is a bit more squared which might lead to more print but if you're carrying iwb it shouldn't matter much. Weight and operation are very similar. Kahr has a steep but highly polished feedramp, glocks is not nearly as steep. The kahrs tend to have pricey magazines but usually com with 2-3 depending in model (onle 1 if you get a cw series). Both would be good choices but I lean more toward the Kahr because the resale value tends to stay a but higher than the glock and the premium series Kahrs have an (arguably) better barrel made to match standard.

I can't make much of a fair comparison to the shield as I have had very little range time with one (~50rds). Good gun but it had a... looseness to it that I've only seen in Rugers, S&W and the like. Wasn't very accurate in my hands past 20 yards. Trigger and operation felt pretty good though and the size was right for concealment.

Just my experience though

>>27947852
Holy buttfuck forgive my typos

>>27946536
Kahr is one hell of a company, it may not be a gun where you can put all these lights on the bottom and other shit, but it is one of the nicest guns i have ever owned