I thought you might like this, /jp/. The original is at htt

>>16379153
I appreciate the work but this is clearly impure.

>>16379828
In what sense? Not of a single expected substance, but adulterated with something else? Ritually impure? Not belonging exclusively to the expected category but containing traits of other categories?

>>16379153
Who are all these girls?

>>16382685
There is one word in your comment that is based on an incorrect assumption. I will leave you to guess which word that is.

>>16382685

They are girls with weiners

>>16382685
>>16382893
OP here: I should note that the picture isn't super-related, I just picked it out because it's on the same general topic and you have to post an image.

>>16382893
Wait what

>>16394133
They are girls with wieners. What, can't you hear?

>>16382893
Excellent.

Which boy butt will you claim first, /jp/? I call dibs on far left! I want to jack off his cute feminine dick as I inseminate his supple ass with my filthy NEET seed

>>16398613
Funny enough, I think far left may be the one character in this image who's actually a girl. Not biologically, of course, but there are some arguments for Jun being of female gender. Something to do with something that happened in an OVA, I think.