Freshmen college students told me the working class votes against

The working class shouldn't be allowed to vote.

>>79196367
and it will make the real estate cost more

so if you are not a construction worker you get no benefits but your rent or a planning house purchase can get more expensive...

>up to 30%

Why not just figure out how much it actually is? Or if you're trying to be dishonest just say "up to 5 billion percent" because if you're just gonna give an upper bound there's no reason to give something reasonable.

>>79196596
The demand for housing will decrease if you decrease the population. Their wages aren't increased due to inflation, i.e., the money supply is unaffected so why would real estate cost more?

>>79196367
Back to >>>/pol/, dumb fuckstain.

>>79196856
>Their wages
*increasing

>>79196825
>you're trying
I didn't write the article
>upper bound
I don't think they're using it in the Analysis sense.

>>79196856
because business will want to make the same profit? duh

>>79196859
What an intelligent comment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt0NcaxmGHo

>>79196872
Price is determined by demand and supply, not but cost of production.

>>79196927
>not but
*not by

And yes, the supply might be lower because of higher cost of labour but the demand is lower too because of lower population.

>>79196870
>I didn't write the article

I'm aware. "You" can refer to a generic person, so "If you are" is similar to saying "If one is".

>>79196953
Whatever you say, Janusz. I'm not an expert on English grammar, but I don't think that applies here.

>>79196927
which part of the business owner wants to make the same profit he did with mexicans you dont understand, are you some sorta parrott that can only spout underage pol memes?

File: 1480681102521.png (404KB, 600x590px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 600x590px

>>79196367
The fact that corporatists have convinced left wing political groups that unlimited immigration is a good thing is quite the feat if you think about it.

File: 500px-Supply-and-demand.svg.png (27KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x500px

>>79196972
>spout underage pol memes?
I took economics in university. If you arbitrarily increase your price, you will sell fewer items. Your profits will not necessarily increase.

>>79196367
>liberal economist
So how long until the right retroactively calls Hayek and Freidman communist while unironically starting to spout actual socialist slogans?

>>79196825

Because the supervisor made 30% more and the labourers made 0.3% more. Same way every "up to" number works.

>>79196998
Did you get to the segment in ECO101 where luxury items and necessities were discussed?

>>79197282
Are you talking about elasticity? As a landlord, I still can't demand an arbitrary rent regardless of rent controls. At some point I would get vacancies, i.e., $0 per unit.