>Arab Al-Jazira reports that Israeli F-35i "Adir&quo

File: ragepepe.gif (289KB, 447x415px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 447x415px

>>79057413
THAT'S MY TAX-MONEY REEEEEEEEEEE

would be cool if true
but how would anybody but those lads watching the screens near Tartus and Hmeimim would know if the radars are picking up something

File: Adir.jpg (372KB, 900x599px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 900x599px

>>79057461
Tax money well spent.

>>79057501
Excuse me for asking, but why do you think it's "cool", as it can leave Russia with a major disadvantage?

>>79057413
Arabs are so dumb they probably think stealth means the aircraft can go invisible like in a Hollywood movie.

S-400 can detect the F-35.

>>79057664
coming from a brazilian fucking monkey

>>79057664
Shut the f*ck up you wh*te apologist

>>79057614
"cool" as in it's cool if there's a plane actually not detectable by radars, it's nice tech

and Russian engineers are constantly working on the stuff, and any weapon has flaws and downsides. Right now, they can guess at f-35 characteristics. Actually knowing that they're invisible to the radars will meake the next generation S system that much more powerful. Would be useful in a European theater where it actually matters.

The more they fly around Russian radars without launching missiles at them, the better

>>79057664
Shit you're probably right, after all you're a military expert and you worked as an engineer on both F-35 and C-400 so of course you would know better.

>>79057973
I mean
>>79057828
>The more they fly around Russian radars without launching missiles at them, the better
This isn't wrong

>>79057973
No it's actually not likely they're actually "invisible". From what I understand stealth features and materials are meant to counter centimeter-decimeter waivelength radars, the most common type.

New wideband S-systems radars like Nebo work at longer waivelength. Fighter jets are too small to "absorb" those, because the waivelength is compareable to the aircraft size