Why are ex-British colonies universally better than all the ex-Spanish

>>79033435
a whole different mentality, anglos had colonies to sell and trade their products, trying to get richier not like spanish people, they were just idiots who had shitty kings and lazy people, and those respective cultures stayed in the colonies when they got independent

English wanted to expand their empire.
Iberians wanted to rape amerindians and steal gold to bring home.

>>79033435
India and Nigeria are awesome. I agree

>>79033435
Anglo colonies were in a better position to industrialize. Spanish colonies were either highlands like Mexico or tropical. Argentina was fairly well off but their government made some bad decisions and they haven't really recovered yet

we're just better really

>>79033435
Italy, France, and Portugal were all better colonizers than Spain

>>79035118
Yeah imagine if Italy colonized Argentina. How different would it have been

Br*ts genocided the locals while Spaniards fucked them.

File: 1461534799084.png (315KB, 407x417px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 407x417px

>>79034812
>anglos were just better
youre right

>india
>south africa
>egypt
>cairo

i wish we were anglo colony so bad

File: IMG_5659.png (221KB, 545x492px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 545x492px

>india
>jamaica
>belize
>guyana
>paupa new guinea
>iraq
>any of their african colonies

I am really liking these pictures that don't include Canada

>>79039526
India, despite all the memes is actually a rather successful country if not dirty as fuck
Jamaica is chill as hell and while they may not be super wealthy there isn't much unrest there and people are pretty happy
Belize is like Mexico, but nicer, so there's that
The rest can be fucked