I often see native english speakers write "should of [..]

Just replace with as "should have", "should of" just sounds natural to us I guess.

Just illiterate retards.

they're the same retarded people who don't know the difference between there, their and they're

File: 1498417533521.png (4KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 183x275px

>>78594395

>>78594439

Or than and then

File: images.png (6KB, 229x220px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 229x220px

>aint no

File: Bill whiters.jpg (30KB, 400x506px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x506px

>>78594231
Close proximity of the sounds when speaking. It's not exclusive to english speaker too.
They probably know the difference, just that since it's their mother tongue, they have more automatism than an ESL, which can lead to mistakes like this when not paying attention.
I tend to do that too when I speak a lot to online friend in English.
>>78594463
Sunnshine when she'gone

Ain't no

File: 1501296708438.png (6KB, 375x403px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 375x403px

>til instead of until
>cause instead of because

>could care less

Most people say "Should've" and it sounds like "should of". So that's what they write online.

They mean "there should have" but don't know how to spell.

File: stubid.jpg (71KB, 657x598px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 657x598px

>for all intensive purposes

>>78594231
>"there are braindead mouth breathers who unironically confuse "your” with "you're"