>look up Dunkirk >first thing I see is an independent

it was a boring as hell movie compared to the old one

File: dunecucks.jpg (146KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1280x720px

>as usual the British get chased off the continent within seconds of entering a war
>they turn into the laughing stock of the world
>70 years later they proceed to make movies about it as if it's some kind of heroic effort
Why would you even watch a movie about this embarrassing event?

>>77989912
To be fair Shaft or Jet li would've really livened the film up

>>77990805
Or Jackie Chan with a ladder and a baby.

It's true though. A big portion of the forces at Dunkirk were colonials.

As usual, sissy Europeans forced others to fight for them. The British forced the peoples of the Indian subcontinent, the French forced Africans, the Soviets forced Central Asians and Caucasians, the Germans had all the foreigners in certain SS divisions.

I like the name 'Dunkerque' more than the exonym 'Dunkirk'.

File: CNJNYEuVAAEoRPb.jpg (43KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x600px

If I wanted to see a movie with yellow and brown people in it I would just watch korean or bollywood movies.

>>77990832
Can't wait for the porn parody, Drunkirk

Wait a minute I haven't watched it, is there a Titantic-tier moment where some idiot sacrifices himself because of a door

>>77990953
no but there is a guy with PTSD who kills a kid.

>>77991001
That kid looked mongoloid af.

>>77990735
>god forbid historical events from having movies done about them so people know about them

>>77991001
Now I need to pirate this movie

Nolan is a bigoted cunt. Britfags never leave their country so they think in stereotypes and this is reflected in their shitty films the rest of the continent is forced to watch because the angloshphere won the war.

>>77991001
shellshock*

>>77991651
According to the Dutch newspapers the movie is a metaphor for the Brexit.

I'm not even making this up lol.