This is how Finnish genes compare to other European populations,

>>77165719
>tfw galician

How does this work.

So we're danes and poles?

O kurwa i'm a danskjävlar

File: mämmisankari.png (22KB, 252x438px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 252x438px

We're our very own kind of people

>>77165719

It's not accurate. The Saami score is too high.
Where did you get this? I guess it could be the DNA results of a Laplander or something but not a proper Finn.

>>77165719
>Finland is red, others are yellow/green

What did they mean by this? What is this map supposed to represent?

so you're slavic

>>77165839
It's based on Eurogenes K36 calculator on Gedmatch.
http://gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/similitude.htm

Mun omat tulokset, oon melkolailla 100% suomalainen, mutten pohjoissuomalainen.

what's that, genetic similarity? even the one to Estonians is really low, Finns are a really drifted population

>>77165941
>Eurogenes K36 calculator on Gedmatch
Oh cool i can actually use that lol

File: geenit2.png (173KB, 961x801px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 961x801px

>>77165889
My genetic similarity to other populations

>>77165967
Post your map here

>>77165972
>most similar to your fellow countrymen and its neighbors

WOW

File: 1459452803457.gif (957KB, 500x418px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 500x418px

>Finish students on Erasmus here
>They all look Northern European

Do you have complexes like the Southern Iberians or what.

>>77165941

No mistä oot?

Vähän epäilyttävää kyllä että Lapin numerot on niin korkeita.

>>77165964
I think it's pretty high considering that Estonians are much more mixed with other Europeans, Baltic Germans and Slavs, and even more ancient populations since Estonia is much more connected to continental Europe.

>>77165719
>>77165972
>Literally closer to a chinaman than to a southern french
finns are NOT white

>>77166038
4/8 Karjala, 2/8 E-Pohjanmaa, 1/8 Häme, 1/8 suomenruotsi.

>>77166051
yeah looking at your link I might be talking bullshit anyway, apparently it compares similarity of ADMIXTURE components

>>77165972
what's that sample in north China?

File: average turk.png (144KB, 923x644px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 923x644px

>>77166002
I did average Turk based on Eurogenes results and got this

Appearently we're mostly related to Iranians, Azeris, Turkmens and Tajiks

>>77166144
>what's that sample in north China?
no idea

>>77166199
post the European one too

>>77165719
special snowflakes

File: Cxb8Y5xUQAEQmhz.jpg (65KB, 1024x904px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1024x904px

>tfw closer related to poles than swedes

>>77166199
Would a Western Turkish person be more European?

Finns are not Europeans

File: europe.png (151KB, 1067x879px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1067x879px

>>77166230
here

File: Turkey mongoloid dna.jpg (107KB, 912x554px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 912x554px

>>77166280
Western Turks have high Greek admixture, but they have a lot of Mongoloid dna.

>>77166284
we have official white map with this

>2 is not white

>>77166284
Based basques

>>77166284
are the three Anatolian samples in this one Turkish? why is it getting lower similarity to those than Georgians, Azeris and Turkmens?

File: costanza.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>caring about how white you are

>>77166265
Modern Swedes' ancestors used to live in much more South quite recently, so that's not surprising. Swedish migration to Finland wasn't that big as you guys think, the Swedish speaking minority in Finland was formed mostly because Finns switched their language to Swedish when they wanted to pursue higher level jobs.

File: screencapture-gen3553-pagesperso-orange-fr-ADN-similitude-htm-1500050386413.png (513KB, 849x3012px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 849x3012px

>>77166361
I am not entirely sure.
Here check it.

>>77166087

Apparently the Fennoscandian component fucks everything up.
Saami similarity seems to peak with about 70% Fennoscandian and 30% Siberian but even Fennoscandian without any Siberian raises Saami similarity a lot.

File: turkmen-turkish-genetic-admixture.png (41KB, 752x883px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 752x883px

>>77166483
and this is the Eurogenes results of all Turks

I'll do other Turks too.

>>77166516
OH and by the way i mixed Tungusic Mongoloid dna with Siberian dna because there was no "tungusic" section in the calculator

>>77166487
Suomalaiset ja saamelaiset ovat samasta alkuperäispopulaatiosta, suomalaiset vaan ovat rikastuneet enemmän itä- ja länsieurooppalaisella aineksella, ja saamelaiset Siperiassa poikittain liikkuneista muista paimentolaisheimoista.

>>77166483
I suppose you'd have to look at the ADMIXTURE breakdowns of all those populations to see what's responsible for it

I could dig higher similarity to some Iranian and Central Asian populations to e.g. black sea Turks due to overrepresentation of certain components or something but that lower similarity to black sea Turks compared to Georgians is weird

>>77165719
you are not europeans
turks are more european than you

>>77166586

Oli miten oli, suomalaiset on läheistä sukua virolaisille ja helvetin kaukaista saamelaisille.

>>77166617
>Georgians
Are you sure that they're Georgian?

>>77166638
t. mehmet von stahlhelm

>>77166678
I am a Greek

>>77166516
wait, did you get the Turkish averages from a different calculator?

>>77166640
Päin vastoin, virolaiset ovat osana manner-Eurooppaa saaneet paljon enemmän suht äskettäisiä muuttovirtauksia idästä ja lännestä. Suomalaiset ja saamelaiset edustavat molemmat keskimäärin varhaiseurooppalaisempaa geenistöä.

Mun äitilinja on kyllä U5b1b1a1, eli mulla saattaa olla pieni saamelaisyhteys.

>>77166709
Jesus christ, you again?

Do you ever get tired of shitposting?

>>77166709
thats a neo greek name

File: iberian.jpg (116KB, 1158x759px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1158x759px

100% iberian

we wuz

>>77166729
I got it from a site that used Gedmatch results of Turks.
I also tried to use Eurogenes results but Eurogenes reslts don't mention south central asian etc

File: Ancient Anatolian.png (412KB, 977x1722px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 977x1722px

I did Ancient Anatolian

>>77166782
u Basque m8

>Switzerland
>Northern Italy
>France
>Ireland

>>77166738

Joopa joo. Saamelaisten eurooppalainen perimä(Fennoscandia komponentti) toki liittyy suuremassa määrin suomalaisten eurooppalaiseen perimään mutta niiden siperialainen neljäsosa on aika vierasta kamaa, suomalaisilla kun on neljästä kuuteen kertaa vähemmän siperialaista perimää.

Liettualainenkin on geneettisesti läheisempi sukulainen kuin saamelainen.

>>77166885
Se neljäsosa on sitä Siperialaisia rikastusta, minkä mainisin. 3/4 taas suomalaisten kanssa yhteistä, siksi sainkin tuon ~70%.

File: 100% italians.jpg (120KB, 1205x770px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1205x770px

Romans and shiiet

Okay i found some other source too
i'll try it

>>77166981
>southern germans are more WE WAZ than peninsular spaniards

SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIT

>>77166946

Erottava siperialainen tekijä tosin merkitsee tässä paljon enemmän koska geneettiset erot Euroopan sisällä ovat kymmeniä kertoja pienempiä kuin Euroopan ja muiden mantereiden välillä.

>>77166795
you found specifically "Eurogenes K36" results there, though?

I'm asking because in the pic you posted Turks score 37.51 of "Northwest Asian" while the other calculator uses "West Caucasian", "North Caucasian" and things like that and the components seem to be different/fewer (unless only the relevant ones are listed or something)

the components in the component similarity calculator also add up to only 93% which would make sense if you used those of a different calculator

I misunderstood you a bit

>>77167078
Suomalaisten ero siperialaisiin populaatioihin ei näytä olevan sen suurempi kuin eurooppalaisiin. Meilläkin on vahva muinainen Siperia-yhteys.

>>77166364
of course I want to make sure I'm not wh*te

Greek bro are you here?

>>77167279
yeah

File: Turkey.png (423KB, 984x1723px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 984x1723px

>>77167296
Okay based on Eurogenes K36 results, Turks are closely related to Turkmens, Greeks, Iranians and Azeris

Azeris are the Turks' closest genetical brothers.

>>77166827
cypriots masterrace

>>77167339
aha! well now that makes sense. getting much lower to Georgians than Black Sea Turks

>>77167181

Ei vaan paljon heikompi. Tämä laskuri ei kerro kuinka läheistä sukua Fennoskandia komponentti on esim. kreikkalaisille vain että kreikkalaisilla ei sitä ole eikä ole muuten ole Baskia tai North Atlanticiä.
Mutta kaikki eurooppalaiset komponentit ovat globaalilla mittakaavalla läheisempää sukua toisilleen.


Perussuomalainen, oli sitten pohjanmaalta tai imatralta on noin 5-7% siperialainen. Turun seudulla hiukan alle sen ja jossain korvessa ehkä kymmenkunta.

>>77167340
though that's a discrepancy due to the use of different calculators. if the Turkish anon finds Eurogenes K36 results for the ancient Anatolians so we can compare same-for-same, Sardinians will be at the top or close while Cypriots will drop a lot

>>77167339
This, by the way, can vary from Turk to Turk,
I highly doubt the genetic results of some Turks, we have millions of Nusayris, Kurds and Lazes here. They could also be tested.
to detect a non Turk, Mongoloid DNA is necessary, as can be seen here >>77166313, some Istanbul "Turks" have no mongoloid dna or very low mongoloid dna whereas rural Turks from Aydın, a small city in Western Turkey, has 15% to 25% mongoloid dna.

>>77167575
They could also be tested as Turks*

>>77167575
Turks seem to be closest to populations that have either "Caucasian" or "Central Asian" components or both

there's especially variability in the Turkic-related components even within Turks due to the recent addition of it. I assume some would be somewhat closer to Greeks and Georgians and others would be somewhat closer to Central Asians, Azeris etc

File: 1497556855582.png (42KB, 446x623px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 446x623px

>>77167724
>Turks seem to be closest to populations that have either "Caucasian" or "Central Asian" components or both

Yeah Turks often get Nogai+Jew or Turkmen+Greek or Turkmen+Greek in Eurogenes calculators like pic related

That's not very surprising because Turks are actually Turkmens that migrated from Turkmenistan to Anatolia. And people in Anatolia who couldn't escape to Byzantine Empire didn't magically vanish into thin air.

By the way i found this
http://gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/ancient.htm

This compares a nation's genetic data to ancient populations/people. They even have gladiators.

>>77167845
>Turkish + La_Brana

heh

>>77167905

100% Fennoscandian has 23 for Andronovo which is higher than for any other non-HGs

WE WUZ ARYANS
WE WUZ ORJA

Can somebody tell me how does this work and how can I use it to see my results?

>>77168050
upload your data to GEDmatch, find Eurogenes K36 on there and run it, copy-paste the results onto the link that has been posted above

>>77168144
this
t. OP

>>77168144
>upload your data to GEDmatch, find Eurogenes K36
That's the issue, how do I get that data?

>>77168189
23andme tai vastaava, maksaapi +100€

File: Turkey ancient anatolia.png (24KB, 837x292px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 837x292px

Okay i did ancient anatolia for Turks

It seems Turks in Central Anatolia are more related to ancient Iranians than ancient Anatolians

>>77168189
have your DNA tested with 23andme or something

>>77168231
Juuh en aio antaa 100 euroa ja geenejäni jutkuille. Tiputettu

>>77168266
:(

>>77168253
so they're pretty Kurdish then?

File: Iranians.jpg (713KB, 3240x1903px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 3240x1903px

>>77168324
Not really since Iranians lived everywhere from Central Asia to Xinjiang to Ukraine.
it's actually pretty surprising how i fucking fell for the hittite meme, fucking k*rds

>>77168253

I wouldn't take it too literally since ancient populations can't be described with modern genetic components as most of them were outside modern variation.

>>77168396
keep in mind that Bronze Age Anatolians had increased Caucasus/Neolithic Iranian-like ancestry compared to Neolithic Anatolians so at least some of that shift probably already dates back to the Hattians. and of course the Turkic migrations decreased the similarity to Neolithic Anatolians even more