Is your cunt pro homo-marriage?

>>76539837
Absolutely No.

frag the fags

Faggots shouldn't have any rights

>>76539837
Let them do whatever the fuck they want

>>76539856
I think you should worry more about your country's identity crisis before you worry about who marries who

>>76539837
I am greek and I approve of this.

>>76539837
>germany is literally on a 17 year delay compared to the netherlands

File: 10033230813_a739ac45bb_k.jpg (1MB, 1365x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1365x2048px

>>76539856
Why are Asians so homophobic? Taiwan can into homo sex marriage, though. Does this make you angry?

I'm gay and I don't get why gays want marriage.

The best thing about being gay is very low bureaucracy in sex

File: 7587575494_8a6b27f66c_k.jpg (2MB, 1365x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1365x2048px

>>76539908
We have civil partnerships, which is almost the same. Stop bullying.

>>76539953
You shouldn't make fun of the greatest thing from Greece!
Homosexuality and marriage is a good thing!

>>76539953
its a christian concept
2 people want to share taxes, a bank account etc
that should be legal in any situation
marriage is just a christcuck name for that

>>76539971

>Monogamic MSM

Fucking hilarious.

>>76539902
t.gay
>>76539931
Not angry but disgusting.

File: tumblr_m9wx3p8sn31rfdab2o1_1280.jpg (329KB, 1280x1919px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1280x1919px

>>76540120
You call yourself disgusting? Stop eating sushi and get in shape then.

>>76539971
What's the difference between marriage and civil partnership?

The clear majority support it but it's being blocked by the minority religioustards of the party in power. We'll get it whenever the opposition party wins next which might not be soon but it always happens eventually

File: tumblr_opuiv2ww851uqjdcro1_1280.jpg (215KB, 960x960px)

215KB, 960x960px

>>76540427
It's been here like this since 12+ years.

>>76540418
Adoption of both parents (only one can adopt a child at the same time - ridiculous, right?), equality and some other minor stuff which I don't know about.

>>76540418
If it's anything like here it was basically the same thing except for the church and the word "married" part.

>>76540367
Keep in mind that homosexuality is a degenerate.

>>76540541
What's wrong with equality? As I understand civil partnership is basically a marriage but under a different name. I don't get it why gays want the exact same thing as naturals have. And as I'll never get married it's even harder for me to understand. Marriage is a shitty thing for men.

>>76539837

But that is HARAM, Hans al-Frankfurt ibn Dieter al-Berlin

File: tumblr_o59n8gF8OD1u7y94ao1_1280.jpg (331KB, 600x774px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 600x774px

>>76540653
Stop being so narrow minded and open your narrow eyes

>>76540677
>What's wrong with equality?
>but under a different name

>>76540680
I thought spain was so progressive...

>>76540791
>Under a different name
So? What's wrong with it? It's like saying that blacks should have a right to call themselves whites although they weren't white, they aren't white and never will be. It's not their thing, get over it. If you're not a crybaby it's not a problem for you.

File: tumblr_mjhgkajvVm1rfdab2o1_1280.jpg (130KB, 960x559px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 960x559px

>>76540905
So homos are not allowed to call it marriage, because it's implicitly a hetero only thing? Weird, I can't find the hetero part of the word marriage.

>>76540680
Go to Chueca, Alfredo.
It may open your eyes, and other things
:^)

No, majority of the people are very strongly against it.

Gay marriage doesn't make sense.
I barely understand it.
Are you saying only Christians can marry?
Or that gays who clearly aren't christian, should marry as if they were?

We will get it in 2 days.
Then i can marry my father, that's how ridiculous it is.

File: tumblr_mbjmhhtAtf1ru10evo1_500.jpg (43KB, 500x500px)

43KB, 500x500px

>>76541668
Hot!

Why so many people care about somebody else's private bussiness?
If they are consenting adults, there is literally nothing wrong.

>>76539904
>>76540002
das very foony sven!

>>76539837
We have gay marriage since 2010

Nobody s complaining anymore because nobody remembers

Now stop posting those disgusting hairy fatsos and post some twinks

File: tumblr_mwl43u8gPp1sdsrsko1_500.jpg (88KB, 500x503px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x503px

>>76541833
>post some twinks
no

Marriage is a religious-institutional bond between the sexes. Homos can fuck and pair how much they want, but they shouldn't be wedded in a church.

>>76541902
You don't need a church to marry.

>>76541283
This guy
>>76541902
Summed it up. You can do whatever you want just don't annoy another people by shoving into their traditions and values.

>>76541973

Too bad there is a minority of homossexuals who are like women, they love to get attention. They go to gay parades and so on. No one gives a shit if we are MSM, but they are attention whores and need to say everyone they are faggots.

File: IMG_20170206_170216.jpg (3MB, 3456x4608px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3456x4608px

>>76541902
>religious
no, marriage is social, religion stole it

>>76540905
Blacks do have the right to call themselves white. they aren't white, but anyone can say whatever stupid shit they want. its legal.

>>76542078
I don't like religions, but as far as I know marriage is a religious thing, but some time ago religions defined societies, so everything religious was also social. In different cultures marriages are different only due to different religions.

>>76541283
>>76540791
>>76540541
>>76540367
>>76539971
>>76539931
>>76539837
>>76541900
beautiful. also nice bait

>>76542122
I meant, a black person can't be mentioned as white in news, documents etc. It's not like it's prohibited just senseless.

>>76542143
The only marriage that matters now is the civil one, hetero or homo.
Marriage is just a civil contract between two people.
Church is just for the big ceremony and appearances, but it's quite irrelevant legally.

From a practical point of view, I've no real issue with two people having the right engage in a union that gives them the same legal rights as a married couple.

That said, in principle, marriage is an institution tied very directly to procreation, it is there to regulate to attend upon the responsibilities and obligations of procreation.

>>76542078
You can't divorce "religion" from the social sphere and point out which came first. The concept of religion was popularised by 19th century sociology and is only imaginable through the lens of modernity.

One party wants the parliament to vote on it
The other wants a national vote on it

>>76542248
>marriage is an institution tied very directly to procreation
More like hereditary rights. You can procreate outside marriage, but that offspring won't have rights to inherit anything, it was literally created for that.

>>76542274
Either way would result in "yes" but because of the deadlock on how it's done it's stuck on "no"

Fucking politicians

>>76539837
no, thankfully

File: 1495476986175.jpg (112KB, 816x960px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 816x960px

>>76542222
Maybe in some countries.
Also
>Naturals have had marriage
>Gays came and say "we want the exact same thing, not under a different name, and you should share it with us, doesn't matter what you think about it"
Sounds like some kind of cultural communism.

>>76542304
Not only for that. Marriage provides children with both parents which is very important. There are many restrictions that keep people together so their children can grow up in a full family.

>>76539837
Honestly can't wait for Muslims to take over

>>76542406
I don't care if some chick marries a dude I don't like, I'm not going to riot for it.
So why should I care if two perfect strangers to me decide to marry and share legal obligations?
Wanting to control strangers life sounds pretty communist to me.
You can consider marriage tied to religion, but doesn't mean it actually is.
>>76542460
Thst came later, the proper inception was to recognize hereditary rights of children born inside the couple.

>>76542563
>Control
The thing is, I don't want to control anyone. I want gays to stop annoying other people. If you want marriage - make some equivalent of it and don't bother others with what you want, it's not their problem. Germany gave them an equivalent but they are selfish greedy bastards so they continued to weep.
I'm not sure you're right about hereditary rights, divorce wasn't even possible before. It was like you marry a woman and live with her forever and rise kids as many as you can.

>>76541902
Literally this
They should be able to get a government marriage to get the tax benefits etc but they shouldn't force a church to marry them

>>76542831
>2017
>caring about religion

>>76539837
>It "only" took us a decade longer than other cunts, thanks to this bitch.
So Merkel-haters are basically pro-LGBT degenerates. Strange enough, I thought it were Right-wingers who hated her bacause of the refugees.

>>76542754
>I don't want to control anyone
Then let them do their thing. They won't bother you anymore about it.

Are you people really this autist about the word "marriage"?
If someone created a legal homo union, with the same rights and obligations, virtually the same, but named "Bob" instead of marriage, would you agree to let them have it?
I don't know, it seems very autistic. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck why call it chicken.

And yes, in Roman and Greek times, that was its primary function, the production of legitimate children.

>>76542975
she is (center-)right wing... get that into your tiny underdeveloped brains already

>>76542939
Of course you want to kill off anything resembling tradition you filthy g*rman
go suck merkel's wrinkly cunt

>>76543110
no, but I'd love to suck Schulz's schlong and I'd love to rim him deeply before fucking him

>>76542998
>Let them do their thing
Again, they can do whatever they want. But when they want others to do something they want they can legitimately be told to fuck off. No one owes you anything.

File: 1497877124407.jpg (84KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 720x540px

>>76543074
My brain is far more developed than your, inbreed scum.

>>76543198
They are not asking you to marry them.
I don't see the problem.

>>76543289
If LGBT won't stop showing this pervertions to children they should be banned in sake of future of our children and in sake of moral health of our society. Dixi.

>>76543307
They're asking to let them do a thing that straight people have been doing for centuries and want it to stay like that.

>>76543289
who says that I like this pride shit? It's ridiculous and projects a very different image onto gay people in general. The people in this picture are freaks and sex psychopaths, nothing more... And political correctness allows this shit so that children get in concat with it. Disgusting.

>>76543344
They are still not asking you to do anything, maybe only to not interfere with their private bussiness.
And if people have been doing it for centuries I don't see the problem of letting more people keep doing it.

>>76543424
If they hadn't wanted something from straight people they would have been ok with civil partnership.

File: amcwedding.jpg (149KB, 889x1050px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 889x1050px

Yes, live and let live, who cares.

File: pride-11.jpg (186KB, 1200x945px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1200x945px

>>76543414
This
LGBT people in Russia are viewed very hostile mostly because of these Gay Pride things which portray whem as sex addicts and perverts and not as "normal" people with only different sexual preferences.

>>76539837
Yes, Transylvania is a tolerant and progressive society, we are not living in the past

>>76543593
Civil partnership doesn't have the full range of rights a marriage -or a civil union- does.

In Spain there are two ways to marriage systems, but only one has full legal consequences.

A civil union at the town's hall or a ceremony at the church, but the one with true legal validity is the one at the hall.
A couple who married only by church still has to register themselves at the hall for it to be legal.
So I tell you this, if instead of "marriage" it was called "civil union", virtually the same as marriage and not a civil partnership, would you agree to give it to them?

>>76543836
Can vampires be gay?

>>76543884
This guy >>76540566 said it's already the same thing, I though it's like that everywhere in Europe. If you don't have this for some reason maybe there is the reason, I don't know much about Spain and it's society.

File: tumblr_ml4r2dKMw21s6vtw6o1_500.jpg (116KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 500x667px

>>76543780
>sexual preferences
You make it sound like someone is able to choose... There are people who actually believe this.

>>76544158
In Spain you can have a civil partnership, they are more limited in both rights and obligations than a proper civil union.
The latter is a full deal and here is just popularly called "civil marriage", that both hetero and homo couples have access to.

I asked because the problem with this seems to be semantic in nature. You don't care about the rights and obligations they aquire but just don't want them to call it "marriage".
It's quite an autistic approach to the whole deal.

File: 1494990403560.jpg (147KB, 700x421px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 700x421px

>>76544326
>I don't know definitions of word

>>76544384
I actually want sjw degenerates to fuck off. No matter how big or small a problem is. There are different people on this planet and you can't just come to them and say "now things will be how I want them to be". Well, unless you don't have nuclear weapons..

>>76539837
imagine the sounds of sweaty buttsex and orgasmic groaning these guys would make every night

>>76544384
Also, what kind of limitations there are? If it's about having children and stuff I think it's a right thing. If it's about only two grown ups it seems weird.

>>76544533
>I actually want sjw degenerates to fuck off.
Then case closed.

>>76544593
Limitations? Civil union is the same for both kinds of couples.
Between the partnership and the union? The first one doesn't have many fiscal obligations, no alimony if broken, no working benefits for having a spouse or rights to widower pension if one of them dies, also you need to acredite 5 years of living together to be able to be recognized as one.
The civil union is just plain marriage.
Children rights are protected in both.

>>76539837
I don't know actually. I know they legalized gay marriage (and got really upset whenever it was called that) but I thought a buncha christians had a big fuss and started working on repealing it. I can't remember if they succeeded yet or not.

Personally I don't really care. It's nice I guess, but it doesn't affect my voting one way or the other. I guess it might be nice to get gay married one day.

pics in this thread make me wonder how gay I really am. all the pics of burly dads kissing are a little bit gross. I think I'd much sooner suck a dick than kiss a man

>>76539837
Norg
It's been fully legal along with homo adoption since 2009.
I agree with it. Gay sex disgusts me but that doesn't mean people should be denied their rights.

>>76544837
>working benefits for having a spouse
What?
>Widower pension
Wha-at? Why is it a thing in Spain in the first place?
>No alimony
I haven't think about it much but at the first glance it seems weird for gay couple.
>Accredit 5 years of living
Probably the defense system against fictitious marriages.

>>76545025
>I haven't thought
Fix

>>76545025
>Why is it a thing in Spain in the first place?
What? Why not? Many women subsisted with this when they lost their husband and it allowed them to send their kids to school since the beggining of the century. The post-war was a bitch to them. Now it's not that much needed as it was in the post-war, but it helps.
The working benefits are more oriented to vacations or leaves if one of them is sick or something.
Are there are cases of alimony reclamations between broken gay couples, but I agree it's not common.

>defense system against fictitious marriages.
It is.

>>76545234
Don't lone mothers get help just for being lone mothers? Two of these seem excessive.
>Working benefits for couples
Isn't it unfair for people who are single?

>>76539953
In Germany gay couples don't have the same tax benefits and rights that married couples do, even if they are in a "registered life partnership". That's more what this debate is about. Because the German constitution says everyone needs to be treated equally, which is not the case here.

>>76545352
Single mothers get nothing.
They may apply for some kind of child support, but nothing else.
And people who are single don't have anybody on their charge, so why would it be unfair?
If your spouse has to enter surgery you can take a leave, if you aren't married why would you want a leave in the first place? Taking a leave for inmediate family health problems, like with your parents, have this right too.

>>76539837
Doesn't matter what the government says, fag """marriage""" isn't a thing

Fags are gay. FACT!!!

>>76545565
>Single mothers get nothing
Well it's good. At least it seems for me, I know many think otherwise, even in this country, where mothers get help. A government should enforce people to rise a child in a family or don't rise it at all.
>People who are single don't have anybody on their charge
So you are basically saying that problems of one group of people are more important than problems of another group? I don't think those rights should be different for different people.

>>76539837
We approved it by referendum, it had the highest turn out of any since the one which approved our constitutions formation.

>>76545840
>So you are basically saying that problems of one group of people are more important than problems of another group?
I'm saying that, if your father, mother or grandparents are ill in the hospital and you are single, you are conceded a leave to be with them.
If your spouse is ill in the hospital, you are conceded a leave to be with them.
If your neighbour is in the hospital and you are either single or married, you don't have the right to ask for a leave to stay with them.
If your girlfriend or boyfriend are ill in the hospital, you probably won't be conceded a leave, depending on what your employer decides. You may leave before the end of your working hours.
If you are sick, you can have a leave, no matter your marital status.

File: canadajustin.jpg (91KB, 720x603px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 720x603px

>>76539837
Yes, pro homo-marriage.

>>76546170
Also you can ask for leaves for other reason without your marital status being relevant.
I'm only talking about the right to family leaves conceded by the fact of being married, not the right in itself.

no idea if it's legalized, but why do so-called "traditionalists" completely ignore the long history of homosexuality in europe and asia, when hating homosexuals is something brought over from the middle east? pretty ironic if you ask me

>>76546170
Well that seems kinda weird for me because there can be tons of reasons why I need to leave regardless of my marital status. But that's probably because I don't really have a family and will live alone. Apparently most people think it's fare.

>>76546342
If you don't have a family then you can't apply to the right of family related leaves. Who would you take your leave for?
It's reasonable.
Doesn't affect your rights to personal related leaves, but to people with spouses, the right to those family related leaves means a lot.

File: mobile_high-161n.jpg (128KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 960x640px

>>76539837
kek. I talk with genious psychoatrist and he tell me - gayness is just mental illnes by same way as shyzophrenia etc but because of political correctness we can't give right diagnosis to these poor people and cure them. Funny situation, you go to doctor for help but he tell to you - everything is ok, be sick is ok, you are just "different"

>>76546662
Some conditions are incurable. Trying to cure a gay through making him less gay is like trying to cure a depressed person with "just don't be depressed dude".

File: 9782226132369_pg.jpg (92KB, 590x800px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 590x800px

>>76546815
It's can be cured :3

>>76547048
Only it can't.

>>76546662
idiot

File: 1498485162286.jpg (22KB, 418x460px)

22KB, 418x460px

>>76547728

>>76544899
>burly dads kissing are a little bit gross
Then go and suck off Justin Bieber you fucking twink loving homo...

There would probably be a riot on parliament if they tried to pass it, or at the very least a tense demonstration.

why do you have to keep posting these 50 year old gays though

everyone knows gays die at 30

if you're gonna post men kissing post cute boys

>>76550997
>he doesn't like bears which represent manliness
>he likes flamboyant faggots instead
kys, degenerate

>>76551187
gay elitism is honestly pathetic lol

>>76539837
>>76539931
>>76539971
>>76540367
>>76540541
>>76540791
>>76541283
>>76541719
>>76541900

disgusting

>>76551431
How difficult is it for a homosexual flamboyant Greek to shave his whole body every three days?

>>76551576
are you bitter you're past your prime years or something?

It's okay old man just get yourself a wife and have some kids there is no point in being gay anymore

>>76539837
No.
But personally, I fap to man.

>>76548751
no twinks kissing is a little gross too

>>76551638
>being this retarded

>>76552131
looks like a struck a nerve

File: 1703958-9-1430659505220.jpg (320KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 800x533px

>>76539837
i rather see this happen than fuckin gay faggot

The gays keep getting triggered because the DUP keep blocking it.

>germany are now utterly truly and completely cucked
lmao

File: Bjorn Andresen.jpg (19KB, 450x349px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 450x349px

>>76541833
Sure thing my black friend

>>76539837
Die Ehe ist halt eine Sache von normalen Menschen.
Sollen diese Schwuchteln froh sein, dass die nicht mehr so geächtet werden wie vorher.
Abatig. >:L

File: Bjorn Andresen 2.gif (980KB, 500x369px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 500x369px

>>76541833
And another one

>>76539837
I don't think it's ever gonna happen in my lifetime.

File: 346436.gif (2MB, 500x241px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x241px

>>76539837
I'd say ~60% approves it or maybe more, but at least we have civil partnership
I say love is love, we shouldn't discriminate someone for loving another of the same sex

>>76552410
>>76552529
What a qt. But wasn't he homophobic? or something like that I remember reading it somewhere

>>76552196
It's great, isn't it?

>>76552577
Don't give up!

>>76552642
He didn't like homos because when the director took him to gay bar everyone gave him "i want to fuck you eyes"

So yeah i little homophobe but if people want to fug young Stalin then nothing is imposible

>>76552482
>normalen Menschen
Schwule sind normale Menschen du Trottel.
>geächtet
Achso, dann sollten wir uns also damit begnügen minderwertig zu sein, oder was? Zurückgebliebener Vollspast...

Yes. Gays can get married here. Since May or April this year.

>>76542220
There's a white woman called Rachel, I think who make a surgery to become black and changed her name, etc.And now she's labelled black.

You use bad examples, Vlad
>>76540905
>what's Latin America

>>76539837
Citizens are but the government isn't

>>76539837
congratulations on becoming civilized germany, it only took you 17 years longer than us

The neoliberalist right hates them
The conservative right hates them even more
The left hates them but also want their vote
The ultra left also hates them but they dont say anything about it
I think it'll be legal to marry your daughter before gay marriage becomes legal in all the country.
and I'm fine with that

>>76559845
:(

>>76540427
>The clear majority support it
Nah it's just you and your friends in your transgender studies course. Go in a bogan bar somewhere and announce you're gay. Have fun picking up your teeth off the floor.

>>76560497
It's probably just you and your bar friends who think like that.

The eternal question that's unanswered is why you should deserve taxpayer benefits for having butt sex. Like, should you get them for drinking a Coke or posting on 4chan?

File: 1482367483252.png (803KB, 1169x580px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 1169x580px

>>76560653
>tfw your Schulz train crashes so hard, you go to shill for Merkel instead to support your decadent life style responsible for the downfall of the West
You are the embodiment of a bipedaled AIDS virus.

>>76560791
Not a bad point.

>>76561017
t. edgy /pol/tard

>>76561230
Yeah. Like why is this one particular behavior, which is also quite physically harmful to you, somehow worthy of having the laws completely changed for it?

I think it should be decided on a state and local level. If Massachusetts wants to marry faggots, so be it, but don't try and force Oklahoma to.

>>76561761
Yeah I don't see the point of imposing it on every state. How many gays are there in places like Oklahoma anyway? They're mostly urban people who cluster in New York, LA, and San Fran.

>>76559845
>civilized

kek

The majority was against it, but the majority doesn't matter if the government say it doesn't matter.
So yeah go 0.5% of the population do whatever the fuck you want and desecrate the Church while you're at it, you have the blessing of the government!!

>>76561761
Oklahoma is a 3rd world state. They must be civilized.

>>76565240
>What is separation of church and state?

>>76565240
>This is what Catholics believe
Let me guess, you think that all the polls but those funded by Le Manif pour tous are rigged? You catholics have been the cancer of the Latin world since the fall of Rome, I'm glad you're finally fucking off.

>>76565463
If ejaculating on each other in a leather parade is civilization, then no, I'll pass.

>>76566130
The more you know: you can legalize same sex-marriage and still deny the permits for the pride.

>>76566206
>and still deny the permits for the pride
Try it and see how far you get. During the AIDS epidemic in the 80s, the city of San Francisco proposed shutting down bathhouses to stop the infection from spreading. The faggots took to the streets in towels chanting "Today the bathhouse, tomorrow the gas chamber!"

>>76566260
What you're saying is that you have to choose between
>legalise same sex marriage, still have prides
and
>don't legalise same sex marriage, still have prides

But still, you say it's about the pride. Don't get me wrong, I understand that not everyone can agree. But your argument is just inconsistent.

>>76543780
I have a friend who's Blackfoot native american, that picture would trigger him so bad. War Bonnets are for respected male leaders of a tribe only.

>>76543780
Duh.

>>76565240
>The majority was against it, but the majority doesn't matter if the government say it doesn't matter.
They voted no on faggot marriage in California with Prop 8. It didn't matter a jot because the faggots shopped it to a judge they owned who threw out the vote.

>>76543780
I'm a faggot but I've never understood why they have to be 95% naked or wear fetish shit at the parades. Just keep the explicit stuff indoors like sane people.

>>76541500
How many swedes are still christian nowadays? The only religious people are your refugees. Marriage is not a religious thing nor has it been fore many decades.

>>76569530
This has nothing to do with religion, but it has everything to do with the silliness of thinking you deserve special snowflake status for engaging in a sex act.

>>76539953
>>76570448

>>76566053
>the only thing keeping the Moors and Ottomans from overrunning Europe is dying off
I'm not even Catholic but that can't possibly be a good thing. No matter who you are, you'd suffer worse if the Church goes away.

>>76568798
this

>>76568798
You think people who do that are going to function as a married couple? Of course not.

You can't love another man like you can love a woman, it's impossible simply due to how our brains are wired.

>>76540427
There is a silent majority who do not support it whether it be religious people, bogans and older people. Personally I'd vote no just to see liberals and poofs have a cry at this literal non-issue.

>>76574429
It's a tiny minority of rich elitist liberals who want faggot marriage.

>>76574458
Have you spoken to anyone outside of your basement cunt?

>>76574640
Have you spoken to anyone outside your feminist studies class?

>>76574662
Cunt whether you like it or not, normal people support gay rights.

>>76574274
That's right, because love between two men is much better, much stronger, much more intimate, much more intense and also based on friendship with common interests most of the time. Your hetero love can't beat that.

>>76574662
t. edgy /pol/ NEET
>what are non autistic and normal people

>>76539837
burn the faggot,im proud turk will take over our country

>>76574981
>turk
>our
You'd have to leave your basement first

File: naked-cowboy.jpg (1MB, 3504x2336px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3504x2336px

>>76543780
How do native Americans and cowboys get along on those parades?

>>76559390
>There's one mental person who did X in a mental hospital: the country.
Wow really made me think

Gay marriage and adoption were legalised here a couple of years ago on lawsuits because the way our Constitution is written, you can not legally justify the ban.

I'm a gay fag so my opinion on this should be obvious.

>>76542122
Will you call me Napoleon if I will say that I'm Napoleon's incarnation? Will American news depict me as German if I will say that I don't want to be Russian and I'm German person even though I don't have German ancestry/citizenship at all?

File: wow.jpg (225KB, 1024x1536px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1024x1536px

>>76577110
That's very progressive of your cunt...

>>76566571
Who says that he isn't well respected? At least I respect him, because he's kinda cute

>>76574981
ok