>be brazilian >don't have a real capital >spend

>>75105377
Soulless autocentric planned cities were all the rage in the 20th century.

>>75105377
>be almost the entirety of the New Worlds
>don't have a real capital, country, or culture
>spend trillions building ugly soulless cities in the middle of nowhere

File: 1365009417629.png (13KB, 516x578px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 516x578px

Brazil doesn't have a monopoly on this

Keynesianism i guess

File: IMG_3181.png (42KB, 1128x640px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1128x640px

SOPA

>>75105434
Speak for yourself leaf

Because they're stealing billions of dollars DAILY.

If the capital was in the middle ou São Paulo or Rio, they would be assassinated, all of them.

They're not dumb, this is the main reason why.

>don't have a real capital
The capital was Rio de Janeiro before that.

>>75105444
Canberra is the greatest city on Earth.

>>75105512
Should have stayed that way

>>75105493
That's why I said "almost." Obviously this doesn't apply to the better parts of Mexico and Canada, just everyone else.

I like living here desu. Pretty comfy city.

File: npt1.jpg (36KB, 800x371px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 800x371px

Because building a new city by the government means that you can demand 10% kickbacks from each construction project.

>see also: myanmar

File: Brasilia_aerea_torredetv1304_4713.jpg (2MB, 4000x2667px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x2667px

there is nothing wrong with brasilia, would live/10

File: Brasilia-2.jpg (429KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1024x768px

>>75107060

that is the third capital
first was salvador, bahia
then rio de janeiro
then brasilia