Spain we asked you for two seaworthy ships and you flog these

So this... is the power of the great Armada...

File: 1493646188699.jpg (47KB, 300x281px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 300x281px

>>75026976
>Asking mañana for fucking aircraft carriers

>>75026976
I doubt the problem is a design flaw since the Spanish one seems to work perfectly

>>75026976
qué
no habla inglés
carrier good good carrier it walks over water
*shiuuuum*
bueno

>>75026976
why did you commission to the Spaniards and not the English?

File: boiko-borissov-by-council-of-the-eu-e13479788761.jpg (390KB, 2256x1309px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 2256x1309px

>they trusted a south euro
you deserve it

>>75027726
Y por qué no iba a hacerlo?

>>75027752
t. ignorant

>>75027961
Because >>75027752

File: large[1].jpg (59KB, 1024x338px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1024x338px

>>75026976
Never buy stuff from Spain, Italy or another south-european cunt.

>>75027961
porque me imagino que la ser de la commonwealth tendria mejores contratos?

Fun fact, the only nuclear reactor of Australia was made in Argentina

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-pool_Australian_lightwater_reactor

>>75028064
how fucking third world is Australia that we need us to build their reactors?

>>75028037

CAF trains here work pretty well desu.

>>75028037
We have the most advanced high speed train network in the world

>>75028048
No necesariamente

>>75028095
argentina is twice of australia

>>75028230
with that logic, Nigeria should be developing inter dimensional time travel then

> doing business with Spanish """businessmen"""
> after the Panama Canal disaster
> after the Saudi train thievery

LOVING
EVERY
LAUGH

>>75028701
En fin...

>>75028773
che volve a burbuja que te esperan las discuciones serias dale

It's weird that the Spaniards expelled the Jews at one point considering how Semitic their business practices are.

>>75026976
Could it be they are not leaving port cause you stupid pussies can't operate it. After all, you are all descendants of illiterate convicts

>>75028230

The US also bought nuclear stuff from INVAP...


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/coqui-radiopharmaceuticals-inks-deal-with-invap-283403161.html

File: hobart.jpg (57KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1280x720px

>>75026976
Don't forget that you are also buying AEGIS destroyers from us...

File: cantabria.jpg (119KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1024x768px

>>75026976
>>75032597
a couple new oilers for your navy too

File: sea5000.jpg (13KB, 600x264px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 600x264px

>>75026976
>>75032597
>>75032640

And we are already at the final of your contest along with Italy and the UK tu sell you even more frigates

Caveat emptor
Buy American next time

File: type-26-global-combat-ship-dsei-011.jpg (1MB, 3146x2016px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3146x2016px

>>75026976
Well I hope you'e learnt your lesson, and you choose our Type 26 frigate for your new frigate fleet.

>>75028861
they were competition

>>75026976
didn't they pretty much break down because aussies used their shitty local kangaroo oil for the engines or something

File: lmao.png (104KB, 646x643px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 646x643px

>>75037285
Either that, or BAE of Australia fucked something up AGAIN, because ours is perfectly fine and hasn't been recalled to port.

BAE already fucked up the Hobarts (Our F-100 class), they were supposed to be ready by 2014, they have barely entered sea trials now.

>>75037689
BAE have nothing to do with the ship's propulsion, which is where the supposed problem lies - metal fragments in the engine lubricant.

File: nope.png (68KB, 655x357px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 655x357px

>>75038379
Eh no, BAE fucked up the welding of the central keel block and Australia had to reallocate BAE's work to other shipyards in order to minimize the damage.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/overdue-and-over-budget-8bn-destroyer-plan-in-crisis/news-story/ffe09f3a9a2019f58b49eabfd09c69f1?nk=7943de2bb0a429a6c58ebe804af246b7-1495223695

>>75032775
ironically brits use Spanish software for designing their warships

>>75038744
I'm talking about OP's ship.

>three billion dollars for two big metal bathtubs
goddamn
I'm hoping our upcoming USS Trump is going to be at least $75 billion and be able to launch C9's

>>75038978
I believe BAE systems uses Paramarine software which is by the British company Qinetiq.