Why only Anglo-Saxon colonies thrived? No European country

>>73919244
Because the Brits had the best economic system.

>india
>south africa
vs
>south america

File: 1492539664121s.jpg (2KB, 124x81px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 124x81px

>>73919244
>rest of balkans are more developed than greece

bullshit spotted in instantly

Quebec?

>>73919543
Greece is Arab shithole

>>73919543
it randomly ties regions together. thats why you see poles, slovaks and other slavic trash being blue because of white germanics

File: IMG_0758.jpg (106KB, 450x369px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 450x369px

>>73919244
Anglo colony white other non white, orania is Afrikaner and thrive in Africa because white.

>>73919244
Brits had a very indirect system of control in the colonies - most of the regional learders retained their power. French/Spanish/etc direct control and forcing them to forget their roots and became europeans caused strong antisympathy to the colonial power.
Germans tried to exterminate any problematic people (herero massacre etc.). Er...

>>73919244
Because they replaced the population with their own

This is why for example Québec is our only good former colony, it is because they are french, they come from Europe.
In Africa, they pretty much do the same stupid shit they did before we colonized them. Maghrebis should have been replaced by the Pied-noirs and it would be thriving

>>73919244
> Bolivia, Peru Ecuador and Paraguay having a higher HDI than Columbia and Venezuela

To the thrash it goes

that map absolutly bullshit.

>>73919244
Dude fuck the south

>north korea: blue
>congolombia:green
makes me think

>>73919244
Singapore and Hong Kong are doing great and some countries like Malaysia are doing alright. And even though they're were Japanese not European colonies Taiwan and Korea are doing well

>>73919244
laissez-faire despite being horribly cutthroat is a very effective system for development.

>>73920459
If your theory were correct quebec and france would be at about the same level but france is a failing shithole and quebec is quite lovely
Anglo leadership is what creates a good country, population can be anyone even french and succeed

>>73919244
The ones doing fine had native settlers.

You actually see the same patern with french colony.
Quebec is doing fine while nigger countries are doing like nigger countries

>>73921316
>Columbia
COLOMBIA WEON, COLOMBIA. Quiérete un poco

>>73925572
We are doing better than Quebec lying cunt

http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/salle-presse/communique/communique-presse-2014/mai/mai1422_an.html

>>73925717
Pretty sure no countries have travel warnings for quebec pierre

>>73920459
Chile has fewer Europeans than Argentina and Uruguay and is more developed. Chile is a very mixed country

Argentina and Uruguay were colonized by a European majority and not on the same level as England.

Brazil has also received many Europeans, such as the United States, Canada, Australia. But with more black population, which ended up generating greater miscegenation. Even so, it has a large amount of whites, considering 20% (less than half of the official data) would give a large absolute number.

>>73919244
South America isn't THAT awful
I don't blame "lack of whites" as much as I blame the massive corruption which the Spanish started in the first place, but without strong central spainish military control to keep everything in line, enforce castes, and kill natives it all fell apart

Brazil is honestly better than most of South America in dealing with its corruption and I'd argue it's legal/government system is much more stable. It just needs fewer commies