there is all kind of wrong with the millean
it is kant that establishes moral precedence by his usage of the absolute
mill accordingly would be the akin to the neetchean slave morality
It's Diogenes. The absolute madman.
/dixie/
Aquinas
>>73441272
Hume
Descartes because he is completely logical.
Most philosophers are just sentimentalists ranting about their lives in a third person manner. "Man should be free!", "Man wolf to man!" among others. Descartes used reason to conclude that all empirical reason is invalid, since our sight, hearing etc are unreliable. So it's safe to assume that only one thing exists, and that is whatever source of your perceiving etc is (cogito ergo sum).
>>73441403
>>73441428
>Descartes used reason to conclude that all empirical reason is invalid, since our sight, hearing etc are unreliable
nigger i be talkin 2 yo ass rn. dat is reliable nigga
>>73441327
to clarify
you would only follow mill due to his formulation not because it is intrinsically good, it only achieves goodness through the subsumption of morality as achieving "happiness"
in other words the millean system supposes that morality is nothing more than a formulation to achieve happiness by subjecting everything into values of moral value so that by increasing that value you increase happiness. which relegates morality as a secondary instrument of happiness
therefore happiness becomes the millean end, one that apparently espouses philosophy above lust yet happiness is in a category above morality so that happiness becomes the intrinsic goal, as if people can be happy doing philosophy
irregardless the millean has all kind of problems with it
>>73441505
why do you find it necessary to write like such a pretentious faggot?
>>73441547
not an argument
bimp
adolf hitler
>>73441272
He's the final boss of classical liberalism and only the tutorial boss for philosophy as a whole.
>>73441578
"Irregardless" and not using capitalisation or punctuation detracts from it desu.
>>73445110
i didn't think anyone cared enough