How natural are your country's borders? Transylvania's

Ours are natural in the sense they follow a river, but it is an arbitrary line Stalin drew up.

>>73418465
What am I looking at?

>>73418465
The sea, so pretty natural.

File: golden-face-buddha-24969425.jpg (136KB, 1300x1112px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1300x1112px

>he has border

>>73418729
But what about Ireland?

>>73418465


like 95% natural

the Andes (territory with water that flows into the pacific goes to Chile, water that flows into the atlantic to Argentina)

and big rivers are the border with Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil.

Only the border with Bolivia isnt natural. Tarija in Southern Bolivia almost becomes Argentina, and Bilivians gifted us some land to spite Chile.
The justification for the Bolivian Argentina border is that in Jujuy you had a Customs office in colonial time to prevent cheap goods smuggled from Buenos Aires from reaching Alto Peru/Bolivia, which was the most important colony due to the silver mines.
So it makes sense to have it as the limit between Argentina and Alto Peru/Bolivia.

well they are mostly horizontal lines

It's pretty natty

borders are artificial

File: 1264172159_belorusskaya-granica.jpg (110KB, 800x535px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x535px

>>73418465
>How natural are your country's borders?
Absolutely unnatural.

>>73418465
The Finnish-Swedish borders follow a number of rivers (3 I think). The most well known of them is Torne river.

The border to Norway is more arbitrary. In some places in western Sweden (i.e. Dalsland), the dialect even sounds like Norwegian.

File: Carte_physique_simplifiée_de_la_France.jpg (481KB, 1797x1796px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1797x1796px

Really natural, except the northern part.

>>73421737
Belgium is French clay.

>>73418465
>sea
>the alps
yeah they're pretty natural

>>73421293
Most of the Swedish-Norwegian border is divided by mountains though. I'd call that natural.