Why do Southern Europeans deny their North African and Turkish

Way too proud.

File: images.jpg (11KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 228x221px

>be americuck
>make a thread about southern europeans
>get shot

>>73355804
Why do negroes post these threads?

File: IMG_2646.png (39KB, 424x866px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 424x866px

I don't have any African or turkroach blood.

>>73355804
Why didn't you highlight South France, Bulgaria, and Romania? Arab looking people abound there

File: youdontsay.png (442KB, 444x518px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 444x518px

>Why are they so ashamed of it?
Would you be proud?

>Serbia is in South Europe
>Bulgaria isn't
What the fuck we don't even have anything in common with the Spaniards and the Italians

I met a Greek once who was dark as fuck and he got so upset just because I didn't consider him to be 'white'. The dude started chomping out on me. His excuse of course was
>it's just a t-tan, I'm totally w-white

File: LTgXWFI.jpg (200KB, 1435x1041px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1435x1041px

>>73357223
> beneath this bronze skin I am a whiteman just like you
Kek.

>>73355804
Why should we acknowledge it?

>Southern Europeans exist as a genetic grouping.
>Southern Europeans have North African/Turkish blood in any way more prevalent than other European countries.
>Southern Europeans aknowledge the above and are ashamed

Southern Europeans do not share the same genetic makeup.

For example: Southern Italians, Greeks, Lebanese, Turks and Israelis are smiliar in their genetic makeup. Which means that it is Turks, as an exogenous ethincity, that have "Greek" blood and not the other way around.

Northern Italians, Spaniards and Portguese are in turn their own grouping with predominantly Italo-Celtic genetic makeup. Implying that the non Italo-Celtic genetic makeup is not their own, but imported from other ethnicties, more importantly ethnicities which are their historical enemies, puts an emphasis on one side and is not supported by evidence.


The question is:
Why do some people desperatly try to associate Southern Europe and North Africa/Tukey by putting emphasis on the latter despite evidence of the contrary?

Why are Southern Europeans asked to accept something that non-southern europeans are not asked to? Spain has demonstrably more Italo-Celtic blood than France, and yet France is not asked to accept their North African blood.

Why are Southern Europeans tasked with denying their blood as their own, as some modern non-southern European countries have more North African/Turkish population living in them, both by % and absolute numbers, than those muslims that lived in Southern European countries at any certain time?

What kind of person would shift the question towards the NorthAfricans/Turks?

Who could possibly be behind this post?

File: tanned_not-tanned.jpg (59KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 736x552px

>>73357223
>>73357525

Only subhumans have permanent brown skin or permanent "white" skin.

Among "whites", only red-heads and their hybrids can't get a tan due to the amounts of pheomelanin and the lack of eumelanin.

>>73356995
>middle eastern
>gooks
>sub Saharan
Those only show up if you have a tiny drop of it

>>73357938
The Balkans were ruled by the Turks for over 500 years and Spain was ruled by the Moors for over 780 years. You guys also look a hell of a lot darker than western/Northern Europeans plus the prevelance of blue eyes and blonde hair is a lot lower in Southern Europe. It makes sense that people question whether you're white/European or not

>>73358088
That image on the left is definitely photoshopped

>>73358088

A tan is just a precursor to skin cancer and makes you age like shit

>>73355804

whats there to be ashamed of when southern euros basically controlled the whole Mediterranean for thousands of years; thus, would obviously have some kind of impact on the population.

>>73358169
Look at this perplexed subhuman, he has never seen a tanned person.

>>73358170
A tan is a way your body has to protect against sun exposure.

You get skin cancer if you can't get a proper tan and keep exposing yourself to the sun.

>>73358150
Were the Iberians all blonde and blue eyed before the Arab invasion?

Where the Greeks and Byzantines a Nordic people before the Turks/Ottomans invaded them?

Why has Emma Watson brown eyes, brown hair and the capacity to get a tan if Britain was never invaded by the Arabs or the Turks?


>whether you're white/European or not

The Yamnaya, the original proto-Indoeuropeans, the cause of the R1b expansion, they had mostly brown eyes and brown hair.

Also, Arabs or Turks are not pure races from which you can set standards of deviation.

>>73358286

That is categorically wrong, a tan is the first sign of permanent skin damage

>>73358657
You Anglos make me laugh.

>>73357938
>>73358474
You pretty much nailed it, people here(mostly /pol/tards) have no knowledge of genetics and history. Everyone forgets that blue eyes were a recent genetic mutation that happened only 10,000 years ago. These idiots think being blonde haired/blue eyed makes you "pure". They're also the same ones that believe the ancient Persians were somehow Nordics or some shit like that then the Arabs came and turned them brown. It doesn't work that way, the ancient Persians looked really no different than the Iranians of today. Lets say all Southern Europeans and Iranians were blonde haired and blue eyed then the Arabs/Turks and started mating with the women. People don't realize how hard it is to get rid of a native population by simply mixing, it still wouldn't be enough to dilute the gene pool that fucking much. The truth is that most of these Arab and Turkish conquests were for political and religious reasons, but I guess /pol/'s obsession with racemixing and cuckholdry deluded everyone's views.

>>73358657
> a tan mean skin damage
> anglo cuck saying that

You're mistaking a tan for a sun burn retard, we southern europeans have flexible skin color, we can generate more melanin that makes our skin darker, it's a response to sunlight because melanin filters UV light.

That's why you never see black people with skin cancer yet people with skin cancer are mostly pale cucks.

>>73358110
Inspect element my friend, you can edit any text in any website and much more (for your view only).

>>73358170
the skin type that gets skin cancer has a hard time getting tanned and ends up looking like a red lobster in the Valencian beach.

>>73358694
>>73359462
>>73359538
but you can get sunburn too if you spend too much time in exposure to the sun right ?

>>73358150
most Iberians have some North African ancestry (you can tell by a comparison to Basques) but that sort of ancestry had already been trickling into Iberia since ancient times (confirmed with ancient data now, mtDNA L has been found) but it isn't particularly important, maybe on the order of 10-15%

the Balkans don't have any Turkish ancestry since they lack any Central Asian components in any noticeable amounts. plebs confuse "Turkish" with "Anatolian" which at least the educated racialists got right. and similarly this kind of ancestry was trickling into the Balkans (and Italy) since ancient times

it's also hilarious that you wrote "Western/Northern Europeans" considering Iberia is the Westernmost point of Europe

the only thing that "makes sense" is that North Americans of northwest European ancestry project their biases on what makes a "European". the reality of course is that the northern european phenotypical package postdates the southern european one in Europe west of the Ukraine. as such, you could easily question "how European" northern Europeans are if you wanted

>>73358694
You stupid fucking shitskin.

>>73359834
You are complete imbecile.

File: gooby_unimpressed.png (124KB, 228x334px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 228x334px

>>73359834
Wew lad eternal pirate not even once

I don't deny my N.African Pelasgian DNA though

>>73358110
except it says 100% europe mister in-denial nigger. Thats how the new 23andMe results look like now also.

File: bvmyR.jpg (46KB, 500x350px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x350px

Why do Australians deny their Abbo blood? Why are they so ashamed of it?

File: 1490961295373.png (515KB, 1600x1440px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1600x1440px

>>73357938
>For example: Southern Italians, Greeks, Lebanese, Turks and Israelis are smiliar in their genetic makeu
Nah, it is more like Southern/Central Italians, Greeks and Ashkenazis
Turks and Lebanese are much more Middle Eastern int erms of their genetical profil
The rest of the post is true, though