do you make threads or posts for any reason other than attention

>>72776846
This isn't a blogging platform.

File: 1488778247346.png (179KB, 508x494px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 508x494px

(you) is one hell of a drug.

>>72776863
But it has become and that is precisely the paradox that I present you (with a possible solution as well), that is, if you know this website is shit, why keep coming here? The answer lies in the illogical behaviour of humans. They are driven by addictions and emotions, rather than reason.

File: 1487467557497.png (30KB, 184x178px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 184x178px

>>72776846
I like to express my opinions, no matter how shit it is and interact with /int/ernational weebs such as myself.

>>72776903
>They are driven by addictions and emotions, rather than reason.
Of course, that's the whole reason for problems. The stock market is prone to ups and downs based on people's feelings about current risk and herd mentality, not cold hard facts. However life would be kind of boring without some rashful absurdity to make it more human, don't you think?

>>72776846
i unironically always wanna have a discussion.

but here on /int/ only /pol/acks make a long post thats always the same content and most only join it chanting the same shit
>fukk libcucks jews nigger shitskins jew nigger libs muh whites mudslimes nigger nigger nazi nigger hitler was right jews ctr libs white trump nigger white genocide nigger libnigger shitslimes jewcucks niggerchink jidf shitskins rapefugees niggerjap japnigger

>>72777318
>However life would be kind of boring without some rashful absurdity to make it more human, don't you think?
I think you have a good point, but I suppose you can only say that it would be "boring", "without some rashful aburdity" and "to make it more human" in the first place because of your instrict emotions, because you are not fully logical. You wouldn't be saying this if you were as logical as a robot or a computer program. Your observation derives from emotions, abstract thoughts at best. That by itself could be used as an argument that human emotions are inferior and should be deleted, since your own emotions are telling you it's better not to be a fully rational being. So it's obvious that you're wrong, at least from my framework. And I must add I have a very rusty brain, a rusty framework, so apologize if I said anything wrong or that doesn't make sense.

>>72777429
Except that never happens and anytime you espouse any right leaning views you get told to go to /pol/.

>>72777563
i just forgot one /pol/ack canadian always does this hes a 100& genuine /pol/ack yet somehow stays on /int/ and replies to every post that sounds the opposite of the /pol/acks consensus.

political threads that gather americans always happen this. its one of the reasons that i stopped replying to amerian posters on such threads. you are in denial.
btw im not really a lib.

>>72777843
There you did it again. Anyone who disagrees with you or even just doesn't fully agree is from /pol/.

>>72777908
so you are the said canadian. go back to /pol/. im always skeptical about the current liberal ideology and enthusiasm but due to /pol/acks always attack anything liberal without any logical process and critical thinking political threads here havent ever reached a point where theres a mutual effect between libs and cons ideology. it always ends up being filled with /pol/ack trash talks especially on threads about american or anglo politics.

>>72778073
>go back to /pol/

Okay. Bye

>>72778093
dont ever come back here. stay on that cesspool. how can you have a discussion with those spouting racial slurs all the time.

>>72776903
I completely understand the predicament. I continue to browse 4chan because sometimes I see content that entertains me and it allows me to communicate with people in a continued manner rather than purely "fire-and-forget" posting.

>>72776903
Humans are logical