Why do Poles and Russians call us ''slavs''

>Don't they realise the irony?
Oh, they definitely do.

It's why they drink so much.

>>72734101
Balto-Slavs*

>>72734101
because you take that as an insult?

>>72734101
Because they cucked you out of your identity

>>72734101
t. Ivanis Pyzdzetskis

>2017
>people thinking Slavs are something else than just a linguistic group

>>72734101
'slavs'?

I always thought balts are fino-turkic like hungarians and other turks.

>>72734224
Just the Estonians that aren't even Balto-Slavic anyway

Since when is Slavs considered as an insult?

>>72734263
since at least the 19th century

>>72734263
Since after WWII the Russian subhumans tried to claim the West hates all Slavs and wants to exterminate all of them, but good news, we have mother Russia to protect us!

But we dont, we call you Pribalts

>>72734332
>but good news, we have mother Russia to protect us *for as long as we're useful to her!

>>72734333
Priebalts :DD

>>72734557
Fugg :DD

File: Vyatichi.jpg (522KB, 1236x629px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1236x629px

>>72734283
True.

Mostly from German Empire(wanting to remove Poles from history) and England and Sweden (slave=slav).
>>72734332
Not really.

It's true that because of Russians and Soviet Union, Slavs are seen as drunks, cyka blyad, squatting bydlo niggers without teeth.

File: 14881295024570.png (333KB, 600x506px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 600x506px

>>72734176
>t. Ivanis Pyzdzetskis

>>72734632
>Slavs are seen as drunks, cyka blyad, squatting bydlo niggers without teeth.
Every nation has a bad stereotypes. News flash, hah?

>>72734724
Slavs aren't a nation, Vanya.

File: Polish Lebensraum.jpg (191KB, 1022x610px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1022x610px

Daily reminder that Balts belong to Poland, not Russia.

Also, Moskals out from Kijów, it's a territory of the Kiev Polans.

>>72734765
You got my point, Bzhezhswlauw >:^l

File: Rzeczpospolita2nar.png (567KB, 1957x1539px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 1957x1539px

>>72734811
>Daily reminder that Balts belong to Poland
Not according to this map.

>>72735075
Lithuania was irrelevant

>>72735139
>Lithuania was irrelevant
Except for the part where the rulers of Poland were Lithuanians...

>>72735241
Rulers were irrelevant in Poland.

Also, the entire Jagiellonian line Polonized themselves.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-25 at 14.08.59.png (397KB, 1368x665px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1368x665px

>>72735241
>>72735299
:^)

>>72735241
>The political doctrine of the Commonwealth of the Two Nations was: "our state is a republic under the presidency of the King". Chancellor Jan Zamoyski summed up this doctrine when he said that "Rex regnat et non gubernat" ("The King reigns but [literally 'and'] does not govern")[citation needed]. The Commonwealth had a parliament, the Sejm, as well as a Senat and an elected king. The king was obliged to respect citizens' rights specified in King Henry's Articles as well as in pacta conventa negotiated at the time of his election.

>The monarch's power was limited, in favor of the sizable noble class. Each new king had to subscribe to King Henry's Articles, which were the basis of Poland's political system (and included almost unprecedented guarantees of religious tolerance). Over time, King Henry's Articles were merged with the pacta conventa, specific pledges agreed to by the king-elect. From that point, the king was effectively a partner with the noble class and was constantly supervised by a group of senators. This doctrine had ancient republican thought at its roots, which was then reapplied with varying success to the political reality of an elective monarchy.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Liberty