Spoiler alert for anybody who hasn't watched Logan. You've

>>72394343
>One thing you've got to remember is that the X23 character is a Mexican

What the fuck have you done this time Hollywood

Final bump.

>>72394343
Yes. It's a term college and highschool bitches use often for an older guy with money.

>>72396546
>This is a question for anybody who's native language isn't english or spanish
I already know it can be sexual in english. I'm trying to figure out if it's universally sexual across languages.

>>72394364
>>One thing you've got to remember is that the X23 character is a Mexican

Anybody can be Mexican [spoiler]Unfortunately[/spoiler]

>>72396756
Not sure what this post is supposed to mean.

>>72394343
We have 2 different fords for daddy — generic "пaпoчкa" (papochka) that is used by kids and slang "пaпик" (papik) that means the same as >>72396546

>>72396901
Is papik to papochka what daddy is to dad? Keep in mind dad, daddy and father aren't the same word.

>>72396901
What I mean by this is, can a kid use the word papik innocently with their real dad?

No la vi pero dejame adivinar: el susodicho mexicano habla como el culo, tiene un acento a lo Gustavo Fring y conjuga los verbos para la mierda, ¿me equivoco?

>>72394343
>is your language's word for 'daddy' a sexual word in certain contexts
No

>>72397009
Since 9/10th of your media is dubbed in Mexico I guess you won't even notice any type of accent, she's just as neutral as telenovelas or similar shit.

>>72397069
Interesting. Be honest now, your word for daddy can never be sexual outside of incest roleplay or some shit like that?

>>72396948
>>72396927
father — otecz
dad — papa
"chka" and "ik" are 2 dimunitive suffixes, only 1st one is grammatically correct because "papa" ends in vowel (lampa/ lampochka, but myach/myachik), so "papik" is not really a legit word and kids don't use it.

>>72397535
Thanks.

>>72397535
Isn't the whole concept of "diminutive suffixes" a logical contradiction?