[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

ITT: we kill the inhabitants of a region and transform it

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 55
Thread images: 8

File: 1487810471794.png (508KB, 4972x2517px) Image search: [Google]
1487810471794.png
508KB, 4972x2517px
ITT: we kill the inhabitants of a region and transform it into a nature reserve
>>
File: 1486236410001.jpg (418KB, 2000x1189px) Image search: [Google]
1486236410001.jpg
418KB, 2000x1189px
boom
>>
>>72268970
EspĂ­rito Santo
>>
>>72268970
Objectively, New Zealand would probably be the best. Very low population in a very large area. Only 4 or 5 million people have to die.
>>
>>72269106
DELET

>>72269089
According to google that's a state by rio
Why wouldn't you kill the niggers of rio as well?
>>
>>72268970
Canada
>>
>>72269125
It makes sense, doesn't it? Minimum human death toll, good climate, nice contained space to put a lot of animals...
>>
>>72269164
We could genocide all Africans, then we could have a giant continent to have lots of animals in
>>
>>72269205
Africa has 1 billion people, though. Even if we're ignoring the moral aspect of it, just imagine how difficult it would be to kill 1 billion people.

The only methods we have of killing that many so fast (nukes or anthrax) would render the area uninhabitable for a while.
>>
>>72269269
It would be extremely easy to genocide niggers
They couldn't put up a fight
Don't use nukes, because that would kill animals as well
Just put boots on the ground and kill off niggers
>>
>>72269291
It would be extremely difficult. 1 billion people, spread out over an area roughly the size of North America, many of them living in inhospitable desert and jungle, who would fight tooth and nail once they figured out that whitey was trying to kill every last one of them. Killing them with "boots on the ground" would take decades. I really think that if we're trying to create a perfect nature preserve, then we need to kill everyone in NZ. Or simply evacuate them to other Anglo countries, let's be honest, you're not *that* different from Australians/Brits/Canadians or even Americans. Minimal effort, maximum gain. The second best option, of course, is Australia.
>>
>>72269125
>>72269205
>>72269291
when did small flightless birds become this evil?

basically you could kill whole NZ by releasing a few snakes there :^)
>>
>>72269136
we're already mostly a nature reserve
>>
>>72268970
Unironically most of them. Pop of about 2 billion with communities living on villages spread apart across the globe.
>>
>>72269458
You could unironically fit the entire world's population into the American Deep South (from Texas to Florida to South Carolina) with plenty of room and make the rest a nature preserve. Or you could do the same along China's East Coast. From a purely utilitarian standpoint, we might as well just move all the people to one of those two regions and leave only a handful of settlements elsewhere to produce food.
>>
>>72269375
We should force all Australians to live in the desert while we turn all their coastal area into a giant nature reserve
That would be fucking hilarious
>>
>>72269106
literally this, nuke when?
>>
>>72269458
Population of 500 million would be ideal
>>
>>72269549
Da fuck?
How is a Hector's dolphin posting on the internet?
>>
>>72269580
literally what did he mean by this?
>>
>>72269511
Why concentrate people? To make them easier to control?
The point of everyone being spread out is to have all sorts of unique cultures and creeds while also allowing them to enjoy their world.
>>
>>72269525
Might be easier to just move them all to the other Anglo countries. Australia has about 20 million people, right? Send them all to the US/UK/Canada, turn the now-empty island into a nature reserve.

>>72269553
We're fine with 7 billion. It's just a matter of organizing everyone efficiently. We could feed and house everyone on the planet pretty comfortably. But our primitive monkey brains don't allow it, we're inherently greedy and we don't really care about people on the other side of the world.
>>
>>72269593
You want to nuke the entirety of NZ and you have an NZ flag
You have to be deep in the sea safe from the explosion
So are you a dolphin?
>>
>>72269627
retard, obviously I'd move to australia first since I already know what's coming
>>
>>72269608
We need a global 1 child policy, so each country decreases their population
Nations that do not comply should have their inhabitants exterminated as an example to other nations
>>
File: fierce2.gif (1MB, 266x272px) Image search: [Google]
fierce2.gif
1MB, 266x272px
>>72269455
mostly :)
>>
>>72269665
That's stupid, because the only countries where such a policy could be really enforced are the wealthy ones. The dirt-poor countries don't even have decent paved roads, they're not going to enforce shit.
>>
>>72269647
stfu poo pee land i'll poo on you cause you're dum
>>
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/can-world-really-set-aside-half-planet-wildlife-180952379/

This is a more realistic idea
Each country reserve 50% of their land for nature, free from human buildings, farms, etc
>>
>>72269810
>only 50%
manlets
>>
>>72269716
We'll help poor countries to enforce this policy by giving them free contraceptives rather than giving them free food
>>
File: a perfect world.png (467KB, 4972x2517px) Image search: [Google]
a perfect world.png
467KB, 4972x2517px
imagine
>>
>>72269970
I don't understand what's happening here.
>>
>>72269879
75% would be even better
>>
>>72270070
He deleted the best parts of the US and Mexico.
>>
>>72269455
That's a good thing.
>>
>>72270146
>Yucatan
>Florida
>Dixie States
>Midwest
He left the best parts of both countries
>>
File: map.png (669KB, 1890x1176px) Image search: [Google]
map.png
669KB, 1890x1176px
>>72270249
But why would he remove western montana and wyoming? And even kansas, oklahoma and north texas?

I say just keep these parts
>>
>>72270070

eliminated new york, los angeles, mexico is collateral damage but nothing of value was lost

also deleted other parts :^)
>>
>>72269970
>wiping out the amazonas
good idea dumbass
>>
File: 754StAK.png (267KB, 2608x2416px) Image search: [Google]
754StAK.png
267KB, 2608x2416px
North Americans ITT
Colour in all the counties in this map that you would completely turn into nature reserves
>>
>>72270373
any county not pictured here
>>72270328
>>
>>72270391
Also give me time to vacate my county and head up to wyoming.
>>
>>72270391
So you would convert the entire coastline into nature reserves?
Good idea to be honest
You can go to the beach with nothing but nature
Honestly I would love to do the same with NZ
Coastcucks are insufferable
We should kick them out of their homes and bulldoze their houses and plant trees over the remains of their cities
>>
File: a perfect world.png (429KB, 4972x2517px) Image search: [Google]
a perfect world.png
429KB, 4972x2517px
>>72270354
version 2.0
>>
>>72270521
>>72269970
Rather than wiping places out, can't you just convert it into nature reserves?
>>
>>72270474
We'd still have a bit of coast of north cal, a chunk of oregon and a chunk of washington including Willapa Bay and Grays Harbor. We can build those up as new Pacific import hubs.
>>
>>72270604
The ocean can be a nature reserve if you treat it nicely.
>>
>>72270521
Do you really want to keep North Korea and Germany?
>>
>>72268970
pretty much all of africa
>>
I would transform all the coastal districts in NZ into nature reserves
>>
>>72269525
If you filed the desert with water, then no more desert. And bam! A nature reserve
>>
>>72270980
Most of Western Australian coastline is desert despite the fact that it is right by the ocean
There is more to desertification than just water
Air and ocean currents, and lattitude all have important effects as well
>>
>>72270373
None but thanks for the top map
>>
New Zealand for sure then Australia. Those fuckers already live with some pretty nasty fauna and wildlife. Let's put them out of their misery.
Thread posts: 55
Thread images: 8


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.