>Your country
>What kind of electoral system do you have?
>Do you think it should be reformed?
Canada
We have a Single Member Plurality system, aka first-past-the-post
The last time a political party in Canada won the popular vote was in 1984 with 50.03%
Justin Trudeau's Liberals won 39.47% in 2015
I think we should definitely reform our electoral system because the majority of votes are wasted when your riding candidate loses, and having a government that does not represent 60% of the country is ridiculous
2 rounds election
The two best performing candidates on the first turn go on to the second round.
>>72247020
Do you like it?
We vote for parties,
parties are offered the opportunity to form government in the order of the vote they received.
This happens through coalitions.
If a party cannot for a majority through a coalition it can still form a minority government with the support of opposition.
However this means a small opposition party could hold the government hostage. This happened with our putinbot party, which held a socialist government hostage with a single golden vote.
Anyway.
We have a 4% minimum to enter parliament and we have a president that's irrelevant.
Our system is perfection it self, and the people who try to change it deserve to get shot.
>>72247195
Yes, it's probably like this in 50% of the world
>>72247618
This is what... the golden standard?
Coalition government and minimum enter threshold(in some fancy way).
Its pretty great. Only downside is that you are still suffering media influencing what is a good vote.
>>72246955
The best.
Each state is allotted electoral votes based on population and the winner of the state takes all the votes unless it's Maine or Nebraska.
First presidential nominee to reach 270 electoral votes wins:
>Party-list proportional representation
>D'Hondt method
>no official threshold
It works fine. Apparently it slightly favors bigger parties but as the finns party showed if your policies have support you can easily go from single digits to double digits in just one election.
>>72249863
Sounds neat.
>>72249863
If it's not media it's your friends or demogues or your parents.
Most people don't have the time to form an opinion based on understanding. We rely on society to give us a raw split and than we pick a side.
The function of democracy is to ensure changes happen peacefully more than to supply the best policy or the best leadership.
>>72250031
>you can easily go from single digits to double digits in just one election
9,99% -> 10,00%
>>72250897
More like 4.1% to 19.1%.
>>72250832
>Most people don't have the time to form an opinion based on understanding.
Meanwhile in Media
-There is this party
-And this party
-And these ones, they got votes
And then RV was ignored.
Still good, just not great
>>72252875
The Basic Finns?
>>72252955
Perussuomalaiset