> you're trying to immigrate to Canada > you're

>>71972576
The first two could actually catch some some some people.

Has she actually released some questions to give her anti-shit immigrant platform some attention?

>>71972649
Those are the questions.

Are we safe now? There's no way sandniggers and misc. savages can hack those questions.

File: images-6.jpg (6KB, 248x203px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 248x203px

>>71972576
I could lie.

>>71972773
>>71972790
You'd be surprised how stupid people can be.

>>71972576
> “Are men and women equal, and entitled to equal protection under the law?”
Equal not being 'same'
> “Is it ever ok to coerce or use violence against an individual or a group who disagrees with your views?”
no, I'm not muslim
> “Do you recognize that to have a good life in Canada you will need to work hard for yourself and your family, and that you can’t expect to have things you want given to you?”
bitch i'm from 2nd world

>>71972877
>disqualified for racism, sexism, bigotry and an overly sassy attitude

> “Is it ever ok to coerce or use violence against an individual or a group who disagrees with your views?”

What if there is a group that is violent against me because of my non-violent views?

>>71972971
You'd be fine because your non-violent views result in you not acting against them with violence, and probably get the police involved if they were threatening you.

File: kellie_stronk.jpg (36KB, 650x486px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 650x486px

>>71972877
> Score: 0/3 (Fail)

You have to go back.

File: 1406259798918.jpg (838KB, 2126x1513px) Image search: [Google]

838KB, 2126x1513px

>>71972945
well fuck you too buddy

>>71972576
>Are men and women equal
what does this mean
no, a man =! a woman

> “Is it ever ok to coerce or use violence against an individual or a group who disagrees with your views?
ignoring 'who disagrees with your views' part cos that's a red herring for the real question, "is violence ever justified" - yes, it is

> “Do you recognize that to have a good life in Canada you will need to work hard for yourself and your family, and that you can’t expect to have things you want given to you?”
this seems like a loaded question

>>71973115
it's the sass that got you rejected desu

File: iu[1].jpg (22KB, 263x167px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 263x167px

>>71973133

>>71972576
>How fucked are you?
Pretty fucked if I'm trying to immigrate to Canada.

>>71972576
>> “Are men and women equal, and entitled to equal protection under the law?”
Yes
>> “Is it ever ok to coerce or use violence against an individual or a group who disagrees with your views?”
Yes if they threaten me or my countrymen
>> “Do you recognize that to have a good life in Canada you will need to work hard for yourself and your family, and that you can’t expect to have things you want given to you?”
Yes


Do I pass?

>>71973259
Doesn't work like that, not for us. I have as much of a right to colonise that land as you.

File: based_kellie.jpg (65KB, 620x349px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 620x349px

CANT BELLIE THE KELLIE

>>71972576
The last one is the stupidest question ever.

File: iu[1].png (333KB, 260x325px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 260x325px

>>71973354
*calls RCMP to remove you from interview room*

>>71973419
How are they gonna enter the room on horses, silly?
Also which question did I fail?

>>71973381
Sir, good news! You've been selected for a random strip search.

>>71973033
Isn't the police using violence? What if I want to become a policeman?

I prefer Bernier.

Pity he can't speak English at all. He seems charismatic in French.

>>71973381
>I have as much of a right to coloniZe

Manchild entitlement is NOT a Canadian value! (See section 3 of Canadian Values Test: In Canada you will need to work hard for yourself and your family, and that you can’t expect to have things you want given to you?)

>>71973473
The horses and the RCMP have to duck a bit. The doors were specially installed so they could enter. Each door and doorway costs 20,000 Canadian dollars. Please sit still and be patient while they arrest you.

And legally the violence question might make them a bit iffy. If you clarified you'd join the military if someone was threatening the country, or become a police officer they might be okay with it. Self defense is fine but vigilantism isn't in terms of telling law officials you plan to do it.

>>71973538
I think he's almost guaranteed to be the CPC leader. O'Leary is too much of a gamble and the CBC has plenty of ammo to use against him because he enjoys being edgy on television. Chong is basically a Liberal, so he won't get it.

Leitch is getting 1% on the polls. She shouldn't even be on this stage. Lisa Raitt, Andrew Scheer = literally who?

>>71973538
He's pro-TFW so he's I'm not a fan. The cancelling the Indian act thing is funny.

Second one is retarded, what about self defence, working in police or army?

>>71973609
What if the individual or group that disagrees with my views are nazis that want to kill all jews? Would my vigilantism not be justified?

>>71973647
The poll website I looked at said he was lower than that liberal Kevin slut and a Leitch when I looked. I'm not sure if that was a Canada wide pol or people who were elegiacal to vote.

>>71973516
They use violence if necessary. They can generally decide what's necessary. So yes!

>>71973690
Legally, still no. Instead use social media to try and ruin their lives by getting them fired from their job.

File: IM_GREEK.jpg (33KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 620x465px

> the genius behind the highly-effective Canadian Values Immigrant Questionnaire

Nick "I'm Greek" Kouvalis.

Have memes gone too far?

>>71973768
they have not gone far enough.

File: MAC01_KOUVALIS_POST03.jpg (149KB, 822x958px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 822x958px

*block your path*

>>71973893
Why is he dressed like a butler and also cosplaying as a ship captain?

>>71973195
I used to go to some job interviews just to insult the interviewers bc I really wasn't interested in the shit job they were offering. I got accepted every single time.
Reminds me of flirting now that I think of it. Being a nice guy does not pay, I wonder if the same would hold true for your immigration bureau

>>71974264
I think the people who do some interviews are related to the border security departments. So I don't think it would go so well. If whatever you're saying would piss off a police it would probably annoy off them if you weren't taking it seriously.

Maybe if the employee was jaded it would go fine.

THATS RACIST MUFUGGA

BIXNOOD