Which colonial empire was the best at murdering primitive natives?

>>71561937
Lelgians were very tough on the natives.

No one went out of their way to kill or get rid of the natives, except for the USA.
France, Spain and Britain got into petty politics, turning them against each other and supporting the helpful ones.
Portugal were pretty chill with the natives.
So my vote goes for Lelgium and their hand removing ways.

>>71561982
>No one went out of their way to kill or get rid of the natives, except for the USA.

This statement is false though

>Portugal were pretty chill with the natives.
Are you fucking serious?

Belgium wasn't the one that did the hand removing it was Leopold since he owned the DRC privately. Belgian Congo was very shit though like every other African colony

>>71561982
>No one went out of their way to kill or get rid of the natives, except for the USA.
Didn't Spain roll in and destroy an empire of millions with 900 dudes?

>>71561937
>best at murdering
England, Spain, Belgia.

>>71562055
They didn't arrive with the intent to kill them all, it just sort of happened.

>>71562047
The Eternal Anglo kills natives, my bad.

The practices of the Free Congo State continued for years when it became a Belgian Colony.

We tried to get rid of our blacks through isolation, casual murder, interbreeding, and kidnapping them in order to brainwash them into being middle class white people.
Despite all this there are still people who insist on being indigenous.

File: BelgianCongo.jpg (267KB, 800x535px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 800x535px

>>71561937
Britain, Spain, Portugal and France probably because of the Americas and Australia.

Killing all the natives to make new white countries got mostly phased out in the second era of colonialism (What your map is from) so in that era Belgium, Germany and maybe Japan.

File: Leopold_ii_garter_knight.jpg (136KB, 695x1041px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 695x1041px

Belgium

>>71561937
The USA, they exterminated a whole race.

>>71562477
It was actually germany
without them lefties ideologies wouldn't get so much popular

>>71562047

Delet this right now, we dindu nuffin.

>>71562080
>The practices of the Free Congo State continued for years when it became a Belgian Colony.

No they toned down on the fucked up things and completely revamped the state. Still was a shithole though

The English/Eternal Anglo did not come in with an intent to kill.

>>71562433
It was debunk. http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/24/mythologies-about-leopolds-congo-free-state/

>>71561937
Dunno who wasthe best, probably Britain and Spanish but we're the worst because we killed almost none. They all lived up to today and some northerners still keep a big part of culture or just literally live like 1000 years ago. It could be even better if not Stalin.

>>71562551
We didn't exterminate the Herero. 10% or so survived.
Or do you mean the Matumbi in the Maji maji rebellion? There are now again more than 70k of them.
Or do you mean the Jews? I get confused with all the genocides.

File: 1001004002424401.jpg (70KB, 544x840px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 544x840px

The Netherlands is generally regarded as treating the natives in a relatively peaceful manner. South Africa was doing just fine before they got Anglo'd.

Also pic related showed the world how to actually develop a successful colony

>>71561937
Belgium, France the second.

>>71561937
It depends on if you're going by number of natives murdered or how brutally they were treated.

If it's brutal treatment then Belgium is #1
But if it's sheer number, nobody comes close to the British Empire

>>71566715
ethnic cleansing was normal until recently. not a big deal

Also there is a diference betwen genociding a guarani tribe and removing a whole ethnic group (like baltic prussians)
german peoples removed a lot of other ethnicities (more than most colonisers), but i'll have to agree the bantu peoples probably get the cake in genocide

>>71566699
What did Russia colonize?

>>71577954
itself.

>>71577954
Siberia and Turkestan (Central Asia)

>best
Spain and anglos
>worst
Sweden

>>71577954
North caucasus

>>71561937
>Best of killing primitive natives
1. Spain
2. Britain
3. Russia (i read once they killed all natives of the kamchatka peninsula)
4. Burgers

>Worst of killing primitive natives
1. France
2. Turks (arabs still exist)
3. Dutch

>>71578598
Arabs aren't really primitive natives in the sense that Native Americans were, though. Turkey shouldn't count.

Hate that map

>>71578968
Why? Didn't you spend decades as a Japanese possession?

>>71577954
Siberia was a colony for some time I guess. Also Finland was a literal colony.

>>71578383
Turkestani nobility were given full civil rights if they accepted Christianity. And they did just like Tatars and many others. There were more non-Russian nobility in the Empire than Russian.

>>71579147
>Japanese possession?
you mean japanese sex slaves

>>71578598
>Russia (i read once they killed all natives of the kamchatka peninsula)
No, they still live there. Cossacks did fight there but they were like 50 vs 1000 locals so no genocide. Locals were killed by Khans there and also fought each other but Russians dindu.

>>71577954
Poland. Finnland. Middle-asia. Siberia. Far East, Alyaska, Caucas. And after 1945 - all eastern europe.

File: amerindios.png (605KB, 1920x1248px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 1920x1248px

>There's people who actually say Spain when most of Mexico is mestizo and there are millions of Indios in the ex-colonies
>Filipinas was complete untouched
>Western Sahara was complete untouched
>Guinea was completely untouched
You think we meme when we say it, but we DIDN'T kill the few natives your Black Legend falsely accuses us of, they just were hit with illnesses they didn't have the anti-bodies for.

>>71578968
You should join the Japanese Commonwealth and accept their Emperor desu.