Does your country have an aircraft carrier? Brazil no. Ours

Yes, they are stealth like our tanks.

>>71262705
and like your relevance

>>71262864
Wow how will Poland ever recover

>>71262864
Sevage

>>71262864
>abandons poland*

>>71262864
Why are you like this, Nigel? So rude.

>>71263691
>even India has surpassed Brazil

My God, this is beyond pathetic.

>>71264804
Why, who should attack you? If China wants to attack india there toy carrier will be nuked in a minute, so whats the point? INstead of shooting fucking rockets in the void of space they should use that money to build some toilets or, I don't know, something crazy, like, not let there people starve to death for exsample.
Pathetic 3rd world nations.

We have two.

Gotland and Öland.

>>71262864
Oh wow

No carriers here :(

File: Bahia-G40-partida-Santos-14-12-2016-foto-6-Nunao.jpg (168KB, 1273x735px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1273x735px

>>71264804

Why? For us carriers are useless.

Bahia does it's job very well, people who complain are either CoD players with no knowledge of the subject or ufanistas.

>>71264934
Brazil will disappear from the countries with aircraft carriers list don't you get this?

No one will look at these lists and think
>wow Brazil has an aircraft carrier! they're truly a superpower!
Anymore.

>>71265282
We have none and if anyone whats to do shit in europe they have to bow down to Queen Merkel first

>>71262671
>ordem e progresso

>>71265153
>who complain are either CoD players with no knowledge of the subject or ufanistas.

And a fat armchair admiral like you sure knows about shit right?

The São Paulo was used for posturing. It was our military equivalent of a Nobel prize, now we don't have aircraft carrier nor a Nobel prize.

>>71262671
Stealth with a smoke screen

File: Feature_QEC_Infographic_980x447_2.jpg (157KB, 980x447px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 980x447px

UK STRONK

>Tfw Britain used to have TEN aircraft carries and now it has 2


JUST

>>71265282
Get all your basic shit together first and then start building aircraft carriers. Priorities nigger priorities.

>>71265783
Wait a second
*takes a sip of water*
Is that a
*clears throat*
Is that a fucking
*shuffles*
Could it possibly be a
*breaths in deep*
A FUCKING RAMP

File: JUST.png (1MB, 574x597px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 574x597px

>>71265830
In ww2 we had 64 carriers - now we don't even have one until 2019


FUCKING JUUUUUUUUUUST

>>71265956
besides the bants, does that realy improves anything?

>>71266028
all it means is that the runway doesn't have to be as long

File: 1485214091032.jpg (15KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 184x184px

rip
saudades already

>>71266087
If you have a slingshot you don't need a FUCKING RAMP

>>71265647
If by nobel prize you mean a rusty piece of shit docked in Rio eating whatever money your navy has left then yes, you lost a nobel prize

>>71264934
Actually both China and India have the same Kuznetsov class carrier, which was made at roughly the same time, and they bought it from Russia. After reverse engineering for years, both are now to expected to commission their new carriers in 2017, which are very well expected to be of same calibre.

>>71265647

The Admirals are a bunch of retards that cared too much for one ship instead of the others and now that they saw the other two forces are actually updating, they decided to kill it, plus we'd never use it's full potential, unlike Bahia which is.

This >muh dickwaving is a meme now, with all those nukes, subs and anti-ship missiles.

São Paulo it's a huge waste of money that the Navy doesn't have and our war ships are already being decomissioned and they need to be replaced. ffs we barely have a decent flee and you fucks keep maasturbating over a rusty overpriced POS that barely ever sailed under BR Navy flag and the modernization would cost the same price as the Bahia itself.

>you're armchair admiral

Yes and seems i know more than your shitty ufanista children's ass.

>>71266157
SLINGSHOTS ARE FOR SCHOOL KIDS NOT AIRCRAFT CARRIERS

>>71262671
We have one. Also we sold one carrier to China and one to India. And now they have carriers too.

File: 14018_27_3.jpg (14KB, 491x202px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 491x202px

>>71266256
>High level engineering
vs
>A LITERAL RAMP

>>71266239
When it comes to aircraft carriers what matters more than the ship are the aircrews and the number and quality of the planes, not so much the ship itself.
Although India might have a slight edge in that regard, I'm pretty sure without toilets they can squeeze in another plane or two.

File: 010v2.jpg (709KB, 1024x1365px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 1024x1365px

>His country doesn't have, AT LEAST, 1 ( O N E ) fucking ramp.

wew

>>71266239
is there anyonw who could realy attack India? As a european I have little insight into asian policies
Pakistan? What else? Why not more efficiant Destroyers instead?

File: tmp_27367-HMS Ocean1610737271.jpg (65KB, 576x376px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 576x376px

>>71265992

We have one. HMS Ocean.

File: Swiss Carrier.jpg (66KB, 640x389px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x389px

>>71262671

We do

Fear the mighty swiss military

>>71266864
kekeridoo

>>71266028

Complex question requires a complex answer.

Can't give a good answer currently, will be able to in an hour or two.

>>71265992
>He thinks it will be built in time for 2019

>>71265783
Will be, when we get some actual fucking planes for it. Until then, all we have a mobile golf course and ski slope for navy fatboys.

>>71266864

Couldn't they just fly for the destination?

>>71267122

HMS Queen Elizabeth is starting her flight trials in the summer. She'll also be travelling over to America early next year for her fixed wing trials.

>>71262864
JUST LIKE ON R/4CHAN XDD

>>71267244

it was a boat for display at a military event.

>>71267236

We have aircraft for them.

By the time that she will reaches full operational capability, there will be 42 F-35Bs and 24 of them will be available as front line fighter jets.

>>71267330
It's not even painted yet.

Is HoI4 any good to scratch my WW2 itch

File: tmp_27367-HMS-Queen-Elizabeth-Masthead728855543.jpg (368KB, 1500x1090px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1500x1090px

>>71267537
>It's not even painted yet.

?

Are you talking about the deck? The deck has been coated. Will show it in the next pic.

File: tmp_27367-flight-deck-hms-queen-elizabeth-aircraft-carrier-1138662840.jpg (100KB, 1200x660px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1200x660px

>>71267537
>>71267656

>>71267656
Yeah, one coat of paint rushed over on top of the holding paint that was supposed to come off before it they originally put this coat on. There are big paint bubbles the depth of your arm below the water. The whole thing needs to have that shit scraped off and they'll need to start again.

They were so late getting it ready in time for the Queens visit they didn't do the job right and now it's fucked.

And that's just the paint. Never mind the whole host of other issues plaguing the assembly of this thing.

>>71267787

Is this why it has been pushed back to summer? And doger issues happens in every first of the class. The hogging issue is a non-issue talked up by Sharkey.

>>71265783
A FUCKING RAMP

>>71268082
It probably is, but to tell the truth it's going to take longer than they claim. Internally the whole thing is a shitshow.

The launch is pushed to 2020 now, but I doubt even thats even pushing it if it's to be done right.

I hope the UK makes more carriers

>>71265830
That would be us if people like Bernie were in power. That way we could afford to pay for everyone's glass blowing and Afro-American history degrees.

File: Armada.jpg (2MB, 2293x1720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2293x1720px

>>71267236
Is it too late to reintroduce the Harriers if that actually happens?

>>71268798

In all reality, yes.

Though, there's still <14 combat capable harriers in the UK unofficially. Though they're not really in any condition to fight.

>>71268199

Yeah, I hear you.

>>71262864
>>71263343
*betrays poland*
*ignores Katyn*

>>71266239
India's carrier is not a Kutz

File: 82f.jpg (60KB, 600x584px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x584px

>>71262864
Why you have to be like that

>>71262671
Brazil is not at war so there's no reason to have it. Be sure that the moment it's needed you'll get 5 of those

>>71270479
It's a matter of status, people used to look at us and say ''Holy shit what are these monkeys doing in a fucking AIRCRAFT CARRIER''

File: 1.png (18KB, 623x122px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 623x122px

>>71262671
YOU HEARD THE MAN

Just trust the US, they will protect you!

>>71270663
Nobody even knew you had a... whatever that ship is called.

File: 1487169271094.png (67KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 420x420px

>>71270836
now everyone know that we had :p

File: skateboarding faggots.jpg (158KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1920x1080px

>>71265783
I bet you can do some gnarly grinds on that ramp, bro

>>71264804
>even India
They have nukes, they spent much more money on the military for the past decades.

>>71265647
>It was our military equivalent of a Nobel prize
you cant buy a used nobel made in the 60's from france and it does not cost 1 billion dollars to modernise or millions every year to maintain a nobel that you would never use.

File: 1439761242786.png (71KB, 324x392px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 324x392px

THE ENTIRE WORLD KNOWS OUR ECONOMY IS BROKE AND THAT WE'RE POOR NOW!

>>71262864
Fuck you muzzie scum.

That piece of junk didnt work for years already anyway

>>71272340
Monkey, it was our pride and joy. It didn't have to work, we just had to pretend it worked and gringos would be afraid.

Tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it.

>>71264804
So, a country with 6 to 7 times the brazilian population finally managed to surpass its total economic output.

That is not a defeat man. India should be embarrassed.

>>71274912
>>71272340
Having a carrier is important for a country that wants to be a regional power. It's like having a room full of books rather than a coffee table of celeb magazines

Originally, did you need a carrier to Brazil?
I do not have an open sea to rule, but should we build an airport inland?

>>71262864
and your empire