Why are they called turks when they're not even ethnically turkish?
it's a greek word for a disgusting insect that invades your country for 400 years and tells their sons to choose between mehlit or girl from balkanlar. /hold me
>>70986617
ummad yunanistan?
>''turks'' are rapebabies of actual turks and they are PROUD of this
We shouldn't hate them, we should pity them
>>70986776
>rapebabies of actual turks
They barely left any genetic trace. The only way they cucked the Turks, or better yet the Anatolian's is through language and culture
"Turk" was actually used as a name for all the people in Turkey.So kurds,armenians are all Turks.
>>70986919
kek
>>70986962
"Turk" was actually used only for those that got cucked by mongoloid sandniggers and converted to Islam, much like your ancestors
>>70986519
>implying ethnicity is the most important aspect of identity
How do I know that you are voting for that retard geert?
I like how this is all about perception and what you WANT to see.
>invade a region
>dominate it with culture, military, and religion
>mix up with the populace and destroy traces of them
If you like the conquerors in question, you'll say that they are based and powerful.
But people are so butthurt about us that they will look for ANY excuse, twist any fact, to comfirm and justify their asspain.
But the truth is out there, we're here replacing ""your countries"" simply by existing properly (reproducing). There is nothing that can be done and nothing that ever will be done to prevent this. A dominant peoples will gain respect from the less dominant, and gain butthurt from the submissive. This is why the Brothaz don't adapt to Western culture (the opposite is true), and why they do in fact, respect and adapt to another superior culture. Sorry whitey