>Have the cleanest and most efficient source of power ever created
>Barely use it and generate a mere 20% of the nation's energy with it
WHY
>>70314120
Many people are ready to give up a better quality of life if it means feeling "safer." People who are against guns, free trade, and privacy from the government fall into this category.
>>70314120
Pansies like >>70316144 describes
>>70314120
https://livebunker.rocks/chat/int
Can't. Jimmy Carter placed a ban on construction of new nuclear reactors in 1979.
Le spooky radiation
>>70314120
I blame Americans and Germans for this.
Also Russia.
You guys spread your anti-nuclear propaganda everywhere.
The Russians just decided to suck and irradiate a sizable chunk of the Ukraine.
>>70316331
pls don't blame all of us, just the extremist leftists
>>70316531
No.
Pretending that hippies could cause a shift in a huge industry like nuclear power is just ludicrous.
More than just extremist fringes need to be anti-nuclear for this kind of shift.
If the US didn't use oil it would hurt Israel. The US is a satellite state of Israel.
Half of the USA's power could he supplied by hydroelectric the other half by nuclear. The jews will never allow this. There is only ONE solution.
can't wait for the next mushroom T B H
http://reneweconomy.com.au/france-cant-meet-power-demand-17962/
>>70316272
Would this be simple to remove?
>>70316833
Too bad trump sucks Jewish cock. I thought we were getting somewhere when we abstained in the settlement vote at the UN.
>>70314120
Because there isn't enough uranium for large scale nuclear power you reddit tier wankstains
Also your nation has no decommissioning plants so you're just steadily turning your country into one massive spent fuel pool
>>70317739
What was the point of linking this exactly?
>Take down reactors
>Can't meet demands because safety first
Was it suppose to show that nuclear energy is shit or something?